Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30325562›Full record

ArticleJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society2018

Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes.

Robin Bofinger, May Zaw-Thin, Nicholas J Mitchell, P Stephen Patrick, Cassandra Stowe, Ana Gomez-Ramirez, Helen C Hailes, Tammy L Kalber, Alethea B Tabor

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In Vivo Evaluation of PamJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin BofingerDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20, Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, UK.
May Zaw-ThinUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.
Nicholas J MitchellDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20, Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, UK.
P Stephen PatrickUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-1729
Cassandra StoweUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.
Ana Gomez-RamirezUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.
Helen C HailesDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20, Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, UK.
Tammy L KalberUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3378-3748
Alethea B TaborDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20, Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8216-0347
University College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C1519/A6906Cancer Research UK C5255/A15935Medical Research Council MR/K026739/1Medical Research Council MR/R026416/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design, synthesis and formulation of non-viral gene delivery vectors is an area of renewed research interest. Amongst the most efficient non-viral gene delivery systems are lipopolyplexes, in which cationic peptides are co-formulated with plasmid DNA and lipids. One advantage of lipopolyplex vectors is that they have the potential to be targeted to specific cell types by attaching peptide targeting ligands on the surface, thus increasing both the transfection efficiency and selectivity for disease targets such as cancer cells. In this paper, we have investigated two different modes of displaying cell-specific peptide targeting ligands at the surface of lipopolyplexes. Lipopolyplexes formulated with bimodal peptides, with both receptor binding and DNA condensing sequences, were compared with lipopolyplexes with the peptide targeting ligand directly conjugated to one of the lipids. Three EGFR targeting peptide sequences were studied, together with a range of lipid formulations and maleimide lipid structures. The biophysical properties of the lipopolyplexes and their transfection efficiencies in a basal-like breast cancer cell line were investigated using plasmid DNA bearing genes for the expression of firefly luciferase and green fluorescent protein. Fluorescence quenching experiments were also used to probe the macromolecular organisation of the peptide and pDNA components of the lipopolyplexes. We demonstrated that both approaches to lipopolyplex targeting give reasonable transfection efficiencies, and the transfection efficiency of each lipopolyplex formulation is highly dependent on the sequence of the targeting peptide. To achieve maximum therapeutic efficiency, different peptide targeting sequences and lipopolyplex architectures should be investigated for each target cell type.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBreast NeoplasmsDNAErbB ReceptorsFemaleGenetic VectorsHumansLigandsLipidsPlasmidsProtein ConformationSurface PropertiesTransfectionAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDNAEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsLigandsLipidsgene deliverylipopolyplexliposometargeting peptide

Identifiers

PMID30325562
PMCPMC6282963
OpenAlexW2896870323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.