ArticleThe Laryngoscope2019
Supporting cell survival after cochlear implant surgery.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomical Integrity of the Human Cochlea Estimated with Optical Coherence Tomography for Future Clinical Application.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Anatomical integrity of the human cochlea estimated with optical coherence tomography for future clinical application.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Sialyllactose preserves residual hearing after cochlear implantation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Supporting-cell vs. hair-cell survival in the human cochlea: Implications for regenerative therapies.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Supporting-cell vs. hair-cell survival in the human cochlea: Implications for regenerative therapies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Supporting Cells and Their Potential Roles in Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2019Review
- Translating animal models to human therapeutics in noise-induced and age-related hearing loss.Hearing research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Supporting cells (SCs) provide structure and maintain an environment that allows hair cells to receive and transmit signals in the auditory pathway. After insult to hair cells and ganglion cells, SCs respond by marking unsalvageable cells for death and maintain structural integrity. Although the histopathology after cochlear implantation has been described regarding hair cells and neural structures, surviving SCs in the implanted ear have not. We present a patient whose posthumous examination of an implanted cochlea demonstrated SC survival. This finding has implications for SC function in maintaining electrical hearing and candidacy for future hair cell regeneration therapies. Laryngoscope, 129:E36-E40, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.