Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30325465›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2019

A prediction model for neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries: an analysis of data from population surveillance sites in India, Nepal and Bangladesh.

Tanja A J Houweling, David van Klaveren, Sushmita Das, Kishwar Azad, Prasanta Tripathy, Dharma Manandhar, Melissa Neuman, Erik de Jonge, Jasper V Been, Ewout Steyerberg and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Tanja A J HouwelingDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David van KlaverenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sushmita DasSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action (SNEHA), Mumbai, India.
Kishwar AzadPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Prasanta TripathyEkjut, West Singhbhum, India.
Dharma ManandharMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Melissa NeumanInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Erik de JongeDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper V BeenErasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anthony CostelloInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity College London · GBBRAC · BDEkjut · INMother and Infant Research Activities · NPSociety for Nutrition Education and Health Action · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 085417MA/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn poor settings, where many births and neonatal deaths occur at home, prediction models of neonatal mortality in the general population can aid public-health policy-making. No such models are available in the international literature. We developed and validated a prediction model for neonatal mortality in the general population in India, Nepal and Bangladesh.

methodsUsing data (49 632 live births, 1742 neonatal deaths) from rural and urban surveillance sites in South Asia, we developed regression models to predict the risk of neonatal death with characteristics known at (i) the start of pregnancy, (ii) start of delivery and (iii) 5 minutes post partum. We assessed the models' discriminative ability by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), using cross-validation between sites.

resultsAt the start of pregnancy, predictive ability was moderate {AUC 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.61]} and predictors of neonatal death were low maternal education and economic status, short birth interval, primigravida, and young and advanced maternal age. At the start of delivery, predictive ability was considerably better [AUC 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76)] and prematurity and multiple pregnancy were strong predictors of death. At 5 minutes post partum, predictive ability was good [AUC: 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89)]; very strong predictors were multiple birth, prematurity and a poor condition of the infant at 5 minutes.

conclusionsWe developed good performing prediction models for neonatal mortality. Neonatal deaths are highly concentrated in a small group of high-risk infants, even in poor settings in South Asia. Risk assessment, as supported by our models, can be used as a basis for improving community- and facility-based newborn care and prevention strategies in poor settings.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityModels, TheoreticalBangladeshDeveloping CountriesEducational StatusFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNepalPopulation SurveillancePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentAsiadeliverydemographic surveillanceneonatal mortalitypregnancyprognostic model

Identifiers

PMID30325465
PMCPMC6380321
OpenAlexW2896080517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.