Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30325292›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2018

Working Together to Address Women's Health in Research and Drug Development: Summary of the 2017 Women's Health Congress Preconference Symposium.

Irwin M Feuerstein, Marjorie R Jenkins, Susan G Kornstein, Michael S Lauer, Pamela E Scott, Tonse N K Raju, Tamara Johnson, Stephanie Devaney, Milena Lolic, Marsha Henderson and 1 more

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irwin M Feuerstein1 Office of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Marjorie R Jenkins2 Office of Women's Health , U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Susan G Kornstein3 Department of Psychiatry and Institute for Women's Health, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.
Michael S Lauer4 Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Pamela E Scott2 Office of Women's Health , U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Tonse N K Raju5 Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Tamara Johnson6 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Stephanie Devaney7 All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Milena Lolic6 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Marsha Henderson2 Office of Women's Health , U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Janine Austin Clayton1 Office of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, women have been underrepresented in clinical research, requiring physicians to extrapolate medical recommendations for women from clinical research done in cohorts consisting predominantly of male participants. While government-funded clinical research has achieved gender parity in phase-3 clinical trials across many biomedical disciplines, improvements are still needed in several facets of women's health research, such as the inclusion of women in early-phase clinical trials, the inclusion of pregnant women and women with physical and intellectual disabilities, the consideration of sex as a biological variable in preclinical research, and the analysis and reporting of sex and gender differences across the full biomedical research continuum. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women's Health and the Office of Women's Health of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cosponsored a preconference symposium at the 25th Annual Women's Health Congress, held in Arlington, VA in April, 2017, to highlight gains made and remaining needs regarding the representation of women in clinical research, to introduce innovative procedures and technologies, and to outline revised policy for future studies. Six speakers presented information on a range of subjects related to the representation of women in clinical research and federal initiatives to advance precision medicine. Topics included the following: the return on investment from the NIH-funded Women's Health Initiative; progress in including women in clinical trials for FDA-approved drugs and products; the importance of clinical trials in pregnant women; FDA initiatives to report drug safety during pregnancy; the NIH-funded All of Us Research Program; and efforts to enhance FDA transparency and communications, including the introduction of Drug Trials Snapshots. This article summarizes the major points of the presentations and the discussions that followed.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionWomen's HealthDrug DevelopmentFemaleFinancial ManagementHumansNeeds AssessmentPregnant PeopleQuality ImprovementSexismUnited Statesclinical trialdrug developmentprecision medicinepregnancywomen

Identifiers

PMID30325292
PMCPMC6425923
OpenAlexW2896778965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.