ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2020
Developmental Changes and Individual Differences in Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence.
Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Quality of Parent-Adolescent and Peer-Adolescent Relationships and Trust in Strangers.The Journal of early adolescence · 2026Article
- The Impact of Increasing Subjective Economic Inequality on Prosocial Behavior Development: The Longitudinal Mediating Effect of Trust and Moderating Effect of Socioeconomic Status.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2025Article
- It takes two: examining the dynamic nature of cooperative behavior in adolescents.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Revisiting the musical reminiscence bump: insights from neurocognitive and social brain development in adolescence.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Self-reported childhood family adversity is linked to an attenuated gain of trust during adolescence.Nature communications · 2023Article
- How Do Victimized Youth Emotionally and Socially Appraise Common Ways Third-Party Peers Intervene?Journal of child and family studies · 2022Article
- Multi-Round Trust Game Quantifies Inter-Individual Differences in Social Exchange from Adolescence to Adulthood.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- I'm not a little kid anymore! Reciprocal social influence in child-adult interaction.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Genetic and environmental influences on structure of the social brain in childhood.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- Girls-Boys: An Investigation of Gender Differences in the Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A Trust Game was used to examine trust and reciprocity development in 12-18-year-old-adolescents (N = 496), as findings have been conflicting and transitions in adolescence remain elusive. Furthermore, this study tested the roles of gender, risk, and individual differences in empathy, impulsivity, and antisocial tendencies in trust and reciprocity. Results indicate stability in trust and a decrease in reciprocity across adolescence, but also show that trust and reciprocity choices were influenced by risk, and that empathy mediated the age-related decrease in reciprocity. Males trusted more than females, but there were no gender differences in reciprocity. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual differences and adolescents' sensitivities to varying contexts in explaining trust and reciprocity development in adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.