Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30325053›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

Multi-modal synergistic PET and MR reconstruction using mutually weighted quadratic priors.

Abolfazl Mehranian, Martin A Belzunce, Colm J McGinnity, Aurelien Bustin, Claudia Prieto, Alexander Hammers, Andrew J Reader

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. AI for PET image reconstruction.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abolfazl MehranianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4584-4453
Martin A BelzunceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Colm J McGinnityKing's College London & Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Aurelien BustinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Claudia PrietoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Alexander HammersKing's College London & Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew J ReaderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

CSRD VA 1Medical Research Council G108/585Medical Research Council MC_U120085812Medical Research Council MR/N013042/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo propose a framework for synergistic reconstruction of PET-MR and multi-contrast MR data to improve the image quality obtained from noisy PET data and from undersampled MR data. THEORY AND

methodsWeighted quadratic priors were devised to preserve common boundaries between PET-MR images while reducing noise, PET Gibbs ringing, and MR undersampling artifacts. These priors are iteratively reweighted using normalized multi-modal Gaussian similarity kernels. Synergistic PET-MR reconstructions were built on the PET maximum a posteriori expectation maximization algorithm and the MR regularized sensitivity encoding method. The proposed approach was compared to conventional methods, total variation, and prior-image weighted quadratic regularization methods. Comparisons were performed on a simulated [

resultsSimulations showed that synergistic reconstructions achieve the lowest quantification errors for all image modalities compared to conventional, total variation, and weighted quadratic methods. Whereas total variation regularization preserved modality-unique features, this method failed to recover PET details and was not able to reduce MR artifacts compared to our proposed method. For in vivo MR data, our method maintained similar image quality for 3× and 14× accelerated data. Reconstruction of the PET-MR dataset also demonstrated improved performance of our method compared to the conventional independent methods in terms of reduced Gibbs and undersampling artifacts.

conclusionThe proposed methodology offers a robust multi-modal synergistic image reconstruction framework that can be readily built on existing established algorithms.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAlgorithmsArtifactsBrainComputer SimulationContrast MediaDementiaFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gray MatterHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, StatisticalNormal DistributionPhantoms, ImagingContrast MediaFluorodeoxyglucose F18Multi-modal imagingPET-MRIsynergistic reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID30325053
PMCPMC6563465
OpenAlexW2896549842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.