Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30324585›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Determinants of satisfaction with life and self-esteem in women with breast cancer.

Ana Isabel Cobo-Cuenca, Noelia María Martín-Espinosa, María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego, Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04172350 (Developing and Examining Preliminary Effects of An Innovative Care-improvement Smartphone-based Perioperative Solution for Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04172350 naunknown statusnot on this map

Developing and Examining Preliminary Effects of An Innovative Care-improvement Smartphone-based Perioperative Solution for Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery (iCareBreast): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHE Hong-GuRan2019 to 2021Enrolled112ConditionsBreast Cancer Female, SurgeryArmsiCareBreast, Routine care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of relaxation on self-esteem of patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quality of Life of Women with Breast Cancer and Socio-Demographic Factors.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Isabel Cobo-CuencaUniversidad de Castilla la Mancha (UCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain. anaisabel.cobo@uclm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-3835
Noelia María Martín-EspinosaUniversidad de Castilla la Mancha (UCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1298-6976
María Aurora Rodríguez-BorregoDepartamento de Enfermería, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5677-0165
Juan Manuel Carmona-TorresUniversidad de Castilla la Mancha (UCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7781-872X
Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESEscuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia de la ONCE · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine satisfaction with life (LISAT) and self-esteem in women with breast cancer and the relation between sociodemographic and clinical variables with LISAT and self-esteem.

methodsCross-sectional study with 514 Spanish women with breast cancer. Data were collected using an online questionnaire that included the Satisfaction with Life Questionnaire (LISAT-8) and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Variables are age, education, occupation, marital status, surgical treatment, breast reconstruction, adjuvant treatment, time since diagnosis, the self-esteem scale, and the LISAT. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to identify possible factors associated with the LISAT and self-esteem after breast cancer.

resultsThe average age was 46.34 (SD ± 8.28), average age at diagnosis was 42.26 (SD ± 8.56), and average time since diagnosis was 4.05 years (SD ± 5.23). Reports showed the following: good general LISAT (61.7%), economic LISAT (44.7%), and social life LISAT (75.9%) and medium sexual LISAT (41.2%). Of the respondents, 39% had lower self-esteem (p < 0.001). Those who were working (p = 0.002) and those with breast reconstruction (p < 0.037) had a good LISAT. Women with mastectomies had a worse LISAT (p < 0.001). Self-esteem was associated with the general LISAT (Pearson = 0.536, p < 0.001), social LISAT (Pearson = 0.502, p < 0.001), and sexual LISAT (Pearson = 0.329, p < 0.001).

conclusionsWomen with breast cancer had a good LISAT overall; the sexual aspect was evaluated as the lowest in terms of life satisfaction. Marital status, occupation, surgical treatment and self-esteem are associated with the LISAT. Health professionals should know the variables that influence life satisfaction of women with breast cancer to plan and conduct appropriate nursing care.

Indexed as

Self ConceptAdultBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeBreast cancerChemotherapyQuality of lifeSelf-esteem

Identifiers

PMID30324585
OpenAlexW2897517378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.