Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30324492›Full record

Trial reportClinical & experimental metastasis2018

Systematic analysis of parameters predicting pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in patients with breast cancer converting from cN+ to ycN0 through primary systemic therapy (PST).

C Liedtke, Hans-Christian Kolberg, L Kerschke, D Görlich, I Bauerfeind, T Fehm, B Fleige, G Helms, A Lebeau, A Stäbler and 7 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

C LiedtkeDepartment of Gynecology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. cornelia.liedtke@charite.de.
Hans-Christian KolbergDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany.
L KerschkeInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany.
D GörlichInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany.
I BauerfeindDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
T FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
B FleigeDepartment of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
G HelmsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
A LebeauDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
A StäblerDepartment of Pathology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
S SchmatlochKlinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
M HausschildKlinikum Rheinfelden, Schweiz, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
L SchwentnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Gunter von MinckwitzGerman Breast Group, Neu Isenburg, Germany.
S LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu Isenburg, Germany.
M UntchDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
T KühnDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimization of axillary staging among patients converting from clinically node-positive disease to clinically node-negative disease through primary systemic therapy is needed. We aimed at developing a nomogram predicting the probability of positive axillary status after chemotherapy based on clinical/pathological parameters. Patients from study arm C of the SENTINA trial were included. Univariable/multivariable analyses were performed for 13 clinical/pathological parameters to predict a positive pathological axillary status after chemotherapy using logistic regression models. Odds ratios and 95%-confidence-intervals were reported. Model performance was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. Calculations were performed using the SAS Software (Version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). 369 of 553 patients in Arm C were included in multivariable analysis. Stepwise backward variable selection based on a multivariable analysis resulted in a model including estrogen receptor (ER) status (odds ratio (OR) 3.916, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.318-6.615, p < 0.001), multifocality (OR 2.106, 95% CI 1.203-3.689, p = 0.0092), lymphovascular invasion (OR 9.196, 95% CI 4.734-17.864, p < 0.001), and sonographic tumor diameter after PST (OR 1.034, 95% CI 1.010-1.059, p = 0.0051). When validated, our model demonstrated an accuracy of 70.2% using 0.5 as cut-point. An area under the curve of 0.81 was calculated. The use of individual parameters as predictors of lymph node status after chemotherapy resulted in an inferior accuracy. Our model was able to predict the probability of a positive axillary nodal status with a high accuracy. The use of individual parameters showed reduced predictive performance. Overall, tumor biology was the strongest parameter in our models.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveAxillaBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingROC CurveSentinel Lymph NodeAntineoplastic AgentsLymph node conversionPrediction of lymph node statusPrimary systemic therapySENTINA trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.