Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30324400›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Clinicopathological Outcomes and Prognosis of Elderly Patients (≥ 65 Years) with Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection: a Multicenter Data Review.

Zifeng Yang, Xingyu Feng, Peng Zhang, Tao Chen, Haibo Qiu, Yongjian Zhou, Chunyan Du, Xiaonan Yin, Fang Pan, Guoliang Zheng and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Zifeng YangDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Xingyu FengDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China.
Tao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Haibo QiuDepartment of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yongjian ZhouDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Chunyan DuDepartment of Gastric and Soft Tissue Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Xiaonan YinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Fang PanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Guoliang ZhengDepartment of Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, 110042, People's Republic of China.
Xiufeng LiuDepartment of Oncology, People's Liberation Army (PLA) Cancer Center, 81st Hospital of PLA, Nanjing, 210000, People's Republic of China.
Changming HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Zhiwei ZhouDepartment of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Kaixiong TaoDepartment of General Surgery, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China. tao_kaixiong@163.com.
Yong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. yuan821007@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2643-4697
Guangdong General Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUnion Hospital · CN81th Hospital of PLA · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CNPeking University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most common site of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is the stomach, and gastric GISTs (gGISTs) occur most often in elderly patients. However, the clinicopathological features, treatment patterns, and prognosis of elderly patients with gGISTs remain unclear.

methodsWe retrospectively collected clinicopathological and prognostic data for patients with primary gGISTs who underwent curative-intent resection at 10 medical centers in China from 1998 to 2015.

resultsOver the 18 years, 10 medical centers treated 1846 patients with primary gGISTs by curative-intent resection. The median age was 59 (range 18-91) years. The patients were classified into two groups according to age, namely an elderly group (≥ 65 years of age) and a nonelderly group (< 65 years of age). The elderly group had more comorbidities (40.7% vs 23.5%, p = 0.011), a higher rate of postoperative complications (14.4% vs 8.7%, p = 0.031), and a lower proportion of intermediate/high-risk patients who received adjuvant therapy (30.0% vs 66.8%, p = 0.001) than did the nonelderly group. Regarding pathological outcomes, a significant difference in tumor necrosis was observed between the two groups (p = 0.002), and more cases of tumor necrosis occurred in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group. Regarding postoperative recovery outcomes, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that age, postoperative complications, adjuvant therapy, tumor size, mitotic count, modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk category, and tumor necrosis were factors that affected disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis showed that modified NIH risk category was the only independent factor affecting DFS. The 5-year DFS rates in the nonelderly and elderly groups were 88.1% and 81.4%, respectively (p = 0.034), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 90.4% and 85.5% (p = 0.038), respectively.

conclusionsCurrently, the treatment patterns for elderly patients with gGISTs remain the same as those for young patients with gGISTs. Elderly gGIST patients had more comorbidities and postoperative complications than did nonelderly gGIST patients, and fewer elderly gGIST patients received postoperative adjuvant therapy. Elderly gGIST patients also had a higher rate of tumor necrosis and worse DFS and OS than did young gGIST patients. Further exploration into the diagnosis and treatment patterns of elderly patients is therefore essential.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisClinicopathological outcomesElderly patientsGastric GISTPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30324400
OpenAlexW2896240433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.