Observational studyEuropean radiology2019
Morphological MRI-based features provide pretreatment survival prediction in glioblastoma.
Observational study in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A large scale multi-dataset investigation of brain metastases distribution based on primary cancer type.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Shape matters: unsupervised exploration of IDH-wildtype glioma imaging survival predictors.European radiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based MRI radiomics and radiogenomics in glioma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- A comprehensive dataset of annotated brain metastasis MR images with clinical and radiomic data.Scientific data · 2023Article
- The application of decision tree model based on clinicopathological risk factors and pre-operative MRI radiomics for predicting short-term recurrence of glioblastoma after total resection: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Radiomic and Volumetric Measurements as Clinical Trial Endpoints-A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- A Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Invasion front dynamics of interactive populations in environments with barriers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Radiomics and radiogenomics in gliomas: a contemporary update.British journal of cancer · 2021Review
- Correlations between DTI-derived metrics and MRS metabolites in tumour regions of glioblastoma: a pilot study.Radiology and oncology · 2020Article
- Prognostic models based on imaging findings in glioblastoma: Human versus Machine.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Morphologic Features on MR Imaging Classify Multifocal Glioblastomas in Different Prognostic Groups.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 links glioblastoma biology to a scalable prognostic model integrating clinical, imaging, and molecular features.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- MRI-defined patterns of infiltration and outcome in patients with glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe wished to determine whether tumor morphology descriptors obtained from pretreatment magnetic resonance images and clinical variables could predict survival for glioblastoma patients.
methodsA cohort of 404 glioblastoma patients (311 discoveries and 93 validations) was used in the study. Pretreatment volumetric postcontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were segmented to obtain the relevant morphological measures. Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards, correlations, and Harrell's concordance indexes (c-indexes) were used for the statistical analysis.
resultsA linear prognostic model based on the outstanding variables (age, contrast-enhanced (CE) rim width, and surface regularity) identified a group of patients with significantly better survival (p < 0.001, HR = 2.57) with high accuracy (discovery c-index = 0.74; validation c-index = 0.77). A similar model applied to totally resected patients was also able to predict survival (p < 0.001, HR = 3.43) with high predictive value (discovery c-index = 0.81; validation c-index = 0.92). Biopsied patients with better survival were well identified (p < 0.001, HR = 7.25) by a model including age and CE volume (c-index = 0.87).
conclusionsSimple linear models based on small sets of meaningful MRI-based pretreatment morphological features and age predicted survival of glioblastoma patients to a high degree of accuracy. The partition of the population using the extent of resection improved the prognostic value of those measures. KEY POINTS: • A combination of two MRI-based morphological features (CE rim width and surface regularity) and patients' age outperformed previous prognosis scores for glioblastoma. • Prognosis models for homogeneous surgical procedure groups led to even more accurate survival prediction based on Kaplan-Meier analysis and concordance indexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30324390What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.