Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30324370›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

An extensive review on restoration technologies for mining tailings.

Wei Sun, Bin Ji, Sultan Ahmed Khoso, Honghu Tang, Runqing Liu, Li Wang, Yuehua Hu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Restoration success in former Amazonian mines is driven by soil amendment and forest proximity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Assisted Phytostabilization of Mine-Tailings withPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei SunSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Bin JiSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Sultan Ahmed KhosoSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Honghu TangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Runqing LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Li WangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China. li_wang@csu.edu.cn.
Yuehua HuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.

Funding

National 111 Project B14034National Natural Science Foundation of China 51634009National Natural Science Foundation of China 51704329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of mineral resources and the increasing mining waste emissions have created a series of environmental and health-related issues. Nowadays, the ecological restoration of mining tailings has become one of the urgent tasks for mine workers and environmental engineers all over the world. Aim of the present paper is to highlight the previous restoration techniques and the challenges encountered during the restoration of mine tailings. As it is a common practice that, before restoring of tailings, the site should be evaluated carefully. Studies showed that the mine tailings' adverse properties, including excessive heavy metal concentration, acidification, improper pH value, salinization and alkalization, poor physical structure and inadequate nutrition, etc., are the major challenges of their restoration. Generally, four restoration technologies, including physical, chemical, phytoremediation, and bioremediation, are used to restore the mining tailings. The working mechanism, advantages, and disadvantages of these techniques are described in detail. In addition, selection of the suitable restoration techniques can largely be carried out by considering both the economic factors and time required. Furthermore, the ecosystem restoration is perceived to be a more promising technology for mine tailings. Therefore, this extensive review can act as a valuable reference for the researchers involved in mine tailing restoration.

Indexed as

MiningBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHumansMetals, HeavyPlant DevelopmentSoilSoil PollutantsMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsChallengesEcosystemMine tailingsRestorationRestoration techniques

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.