ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Simplified quantification of
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of software tools and kinetic model selection on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve quantitation inJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- SimultaneousFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The application of radionuclide therapy for breast cancer.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Simplified quantification of PET myocardial blood flow: The need for technical standardization.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- SimultaneousEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShort imaging protocol to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) may enhance the clinical application of
methodsFourteen healthy volunteers (HVT) and twenty-three clinical patients received
resultsGlobal and regional MBF and MFR of these two models were highly correlated with mildly inferior correlation in RCA territory (global R
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
30324328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.