ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019
Long-term endothelial dysfunction in irradiated vessels: an immunohistochemical analysis.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanomedicine-Based Strategies for Mitigating Chemo/Radiotherapy-Induced Cardiac Inflammation and Fibrosis.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Review
- Risk Factors for Flap Loss: Analysis of Donor and Recipient Vessel Morphology in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstructions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Elevated Levels of Serum Biomarkers Associated with Damage to the CNS Neurons and Endothelial Cells Are Linked with Changes in Brain Connectivity in Breast Cancer Patients with Vestibulo-Atactic Syndrome.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023Article
- Recipient bed perfusion as a predictor for postoperative complications in irradiated patients with microvascular free tissue transfer of the head and neck area: a clinical analysis of 191 microvascular free flaps.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2023Article
- Multicenter phase II study of apatinib single or combination therapy in HER2-negative breast cancer involving chest wall metastasis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021Article
- The Critical Role of Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) Metabolism in Modulating Radiosensitivity: BH4/NOS Axis as an Angel or a Devil.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Chemopreventive effect of pomegranate and cocoa extracts on ultraviolet radiation-induced photocarcinogenesis in SKH-1 mice.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrovascular free flap reconstruction has become a standard technique in head and neck reconstructive surgery. Pre-operative radiotherapy is associated with a higher incidence of free flap malperfusion and the need for operative revision. Irradiated vessels present characteristic histomorphological and structural changes. Alterations in endothelial cells of irradiated arteries remain incompletely investigated especially with regard to long-term changes in endothelial dysfunction supporting an intraluminal pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory milieu.
methodsEndothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), E‑ and P‑selectin, endothelial NO-synthase (eNOS), thrombomodulin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in irradiated and non-irradiated arteries was analysed using immunohistochemistry and Remmele scale grading. The average radiation dose was 58.7 ± 7.0 Gy; the time interval between end of radiation and tissue sampling was 106.0 ± 86.8 months.
resultsEndothelial expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E‑ and P‑selectin as well as PAI-1 was significantly increased in previously irradiated arteries compared with non-irradiated controls, whereas thrombomodulin and eNOS expression did not show any differences. However, when comparing non-irradiated free flap arteries with irradiated arteries from the head and neck area in respective individuals, eNOS expression was significantly lower in irradiated vessels whereas ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E‑/p-Selectin and PAI-1 showed significantly higher expression levels.
conclusionThere is ongoing endothelial dysfunction in terms of increased expression of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory markers in irradiated arteries even years after radiotherapy. Treating this endothelial dysfunction might reduce the complication rates associated with microvascular free flap reconstructions in irradiated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.