ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2018
Aphasia Recovery: When, How and Who to Treat?
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.Stroke · 2021Pooled it
- Translational Evaluation of a Machine Learning-Based Interactive Lab for Aphasia Rehabilitation in Post Stroke Patients.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation: Prognostic Factors for Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes After Aphasia Therapy.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Trial
- Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Trial
- Efficacy of exercise rehabilitation program accompanied by experiential music for recovery of aphasia in single cerebrovascular accidents: a randomized controlled trial.Irish journal of medical science · 2021Trial
- Article
- Cognitive Functions Supporting Learning Over Time in Naming Treatment for Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Multifactorial interplay on language recovery following left-hemispheric stroke: A retrospective study.Journal of neuropsychology · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation for acquired brain injuries: Update of Stolwyk et al.'s (2019) review.Journal of neuropsychology · 2025Article
- Exploring benefits of speech and language therapy interventions for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A qualitative study.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.Stroke · 2025Article
- Charting the Course of Aphasia Recovery: Factors, Trajectories, and Outcomes.Annual review of linguistics · 2025Article
- Machine learning predicts significant improvement in motor aphasia with tongue acupuncture.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- What Impacts What: Clinicians' Perspectives of Causality in Aphasia Rehabilitation.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- AI and Aphasia in the Digital Age: A Critical Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Efficacy of a gamified digital therapy for speech production in people with chronic aphasia (iTalkBetter): behavioural and imaging outcomes of a phase II item-randomised clinical trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Case report: An N-of-1 study using amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation between Broca's area and the right homotopic area to improve post-stroke aphasia with increased inter-regional synchrony.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- An exploration of anomia rehabilitation in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe now know that speech and language therapy (SALT) is effective in the rehabilitation of aphasia; however, there remains much individual variability in the response to interventions. So, what works for whom, when and how? RECENT
findingsThis review evaluates the current evidence for the efficacy of predominantly impairment-focused aphasia interventions with respect to optimal dose, intensity, timing and distribution or spacing of treatment. We conclude that sufficient dose of treatment is required to enable clinical gains and that e-therapies are a promising and practical way to achieve this goal. In addition, aphasia can be associated with other cognitive deficits and may lead to secondary effects such as low mood and social isolation. In order to personalise individual treatments to optimise recovery, we need to develop a greater understanding of the interactions between these factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.