Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323958›Full record

ReviewNPJ vaccines2018

Optimizing the utilization of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines: you might just get what you want.

Harm HogenEsch, Derek T O'Hagan, Christopher B Fox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ vaccines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 209 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Controlling timing and location in vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Reexamining AlJournal of computational chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Macrophage-MediatedACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Development of a NovelVaccines · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harm HogenEsch1Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2738-9189
Derek T O'HaganGSK Vaccines, Rockville, MD USA.
Christopher B Fox4IDRI, Seattle, WA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-2619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aluminum-containing adjuvants have been used for over 90 years to enhance the immune response to vaccines. Recent work has significantly advanced our understanding of the physical, chemical, and biological properties of these adjuvants, offering key insights on underlying mechanisms. Given the long-term success of aluminum adjuvants, we believe that they should continue to represent the "gold standard" against which all new adjuvants should be compared. New vaccine candidates that require adjuvants to induce a protective immune responses should first be evaluated with aluminum adjuvants before other more experimental approaches are considered, since use of established adjuvants would facilitate both clinical development and the regulatory pathway. However, the continued use of aluminum adjuvants requires an appreciation of their complexities, in combination with access to the necessary expertise to optimize vaccine formulations. In this article, we will review the properties of aluminum adjuvants and highlight those elements that are critical to optimize vaccine performance. We will discuss how other components (excipients, TLR ligands, etc.) can affect the interaction between adjuvants and antigens, and impact the potency of vaccines. This review provides a resource and guide, which will ultimately contribute to the successful development of newer, more effective and safer vaccines.

Identifiers

PMID30323958
PMCPMC6180056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.