Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323932›Full record

ReviewConservation physiology2018

A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?

Fritz Geiser, Clare Stawski, Anna C Doty, Christine E Cooper, Julia Nowack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Intraspecific variation in metabolic responses to diverse environmental conditions in the Malagasy bat Triaenops menamena.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. State dependence of arousal from torpor in brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus).Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fritz GeiserCentre for Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
Clare StawskiCentre for Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
Anna C DotyCentre for Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
Christine E CooperSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.
Julia NowackCentre for Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although wildfires are increasing globally, available information on how mammals respond behaviourally and physiologically to fires is scant. Despite a large number of ecological studies, often examining animal diversity and abundance before and after fires, the reasons as to why some species perform better than others remain obscure. We examine how especially small mammals, which generally have high rates of energy expenditure and food requirements, deal with fires and post-fire conditions. We evaluate whether mammalian torpor, characterised by substantial reductions in body temperature, metabolic rate and water loss, plays a functional role in survival of mammals impacted by fires. Importantly, torpor permits small mammals to reduce their activity and foraging, and to survive on limited food. Torpid small mammals (marsupials and bats) can respond to smoke and arouse from torpor, which provides them with the possibility to evade direct exposure to fire, although their response is often slowed when ambient temperature is low. Post-fire conditions increase expression of torpor with a concomitant decrease in activity for free-ranging echidnas and small forest-dwelling marsupials, in response to reduced cover and reduced availability of terrestrial insects. Presence of charcoal and ash increases torpor use by captive small marsupials beyond food restriction alone, likely in anticipation of detrimental post-fire conditions. Interestingly, although volant bats use torpor on every day after fires, they respond by decreasing torpor duration, and increasing activity, perhaps because of the decrease in clutter and increase in foraging opportunities due to an increase in aerial insects. Our summary shows that torpor is an important tool for post-fire survival and, although the physiological and behavioural responses of small mammals to fire are complex, they seem to reflect energetic requirements and mode of foraging. We make recommendations on the conditions during management burns that are least likely to impact heterothermic mammals.

Indexed as

Daily torporecophysiologyforaginghibernationmammalwildfire

Identifiers

PMID30323932
PMCPMC6181253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.