ArticleFrontiers in immunology2018
Phenotypic Changes on Mycobacterium Tuberculosis-Specific CD4 T Cells as Surrogate Markers for Tuberculosis Treatment Efficacy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Host response biomarkers of tuberculosis recurrence and treatment failure.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Minimal immune cell subset differences in a cohort of close contacts of tuberculosis index cases.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- Association of T-Cell Profiles With Disease Severity, Drug-Induced Liver Injury, and Treatment Completion in Tuberculosis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Activation and proliferation profiles of M.tuberculosis specific dual functional CD4+T cells from smear negative pulmonary TB patients.PloS one · 2025Article
- Changes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific antigen-stimulated CD27European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Exploring the Potential of Exosomes as Biomarkers in Tuberculosis and Other Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- New Insights into Biomarkers for Evaluating Therapy Efficacy in Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Narrative Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2023Review
- BCG-Vaccinated Children with Contact to Tuberculosis Patients Show Delayed Conversion ofVaccines · 2023Article
- Advancing personalized medicine for tuberculosis through the application of immune profiling.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Diagnosis and biomarkers for ocular tuberculosis: From the present into the future.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific antigen-stimulated CD27BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring and Outcome Measures: New Interest and New Strategies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- Tuberculosis Treatment Response Monitoring by the Phenotypic Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-specific T-cell responses in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis patients.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022Article
- Article
- Assessment of tuberculosis disease activity in people infected withEClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Using TBAg/PHA Ratio for Monitoring TB Treatment: A Prospective Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Reimagining the status quo: How close are we to rapid sputum-free tuberculosis diagnostics for all?EBioMedicine · 2022Review
- Comparison of the frequency and phenotypic profile ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.