Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Response of Gut Microbiota to Dietary Fiber and Metabolic Interaction With SCFAs in Piglets.

Boshuai Liu, Wenjing Wang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Xiao Sun, Junnan Xiao, Defeng Li, Yalei Cui, Chengzhang Wang, Yinghua Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Boshuai LiuCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenjing WangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoyan ZhuCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiao SunCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Junnan XiaoCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Defeng LiCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yalei CuiCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chengzhang WangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yinghua ShiCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Henan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary fiber (DF) is increasingly thought to regulate diversity of piglet gut microbiota to alleviate weaning stress in piglets. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of DF on growth performance of piglets and composition of their gut microbiota, as well as the interaction between gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in piglets. A total of 840 piglets were allocated to three dietary treatments consisting of a control group (CG), an alfalfa meal group (AG), and a commodity concentrated fiber group (OG) in a 30-day feeding trial. Gut mucosa and feces samples were used to determine bacterial community diversity by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Fiber treatment had a positive effect on growth performance and metabolism of SCFAs in piglets, in particular, compared with CG, the diarrhea rate was significantly decreased, and the content of propionic acid (PA) in the cecum was markedly increased in AG. The Shannon indices of the jejunum microbiota in AG were higher than CG. At the genus level, compared to CG, in the duodenum, the relative abundance of

Indexed as

diarrhea ratedietary fibergut microbiotapigletsshort-chain fatty acid

Identifiers

PMID30323803
PMCPMC6172335
OpenAlexW2891151627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.