ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Pitch Class and Envelope Effects in the Tritone Paradox Are Mediated by Differently Pronounced Frequency Preference Regions.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shepard tones (octave complex tones) are well defined in pitch chroma but are ambiguous in pitch height. Pitch direction judgments of Shepard tones depend on the clockwise distance of the pitch classes on the pitch class circle, indicating the proximity principle in auditory perception. The tritone paradox emerges when two Shepard tones that form a tritone interval are presented successively. In this case, no proximity cue is available and judgments depend on the first tone and vary from person to person. A common explanation for the tritone paradox is the assumption of a specific pitch class comparison mechanism based on a pitch class template that is differently orientated from person to person. In contrast, psychoacoustic approaches (e.g., the Terhardt virtual pitch theory) explain it with common pitch-processing mechanisms. The present paper proposes a probabilistic threshold model, which estimates Shepard tone pitch height by a probabilistic fundamental frequency extraction. In the first processing stage, only those frequency components whose amplitudes are above specific randomly distributed threshold values are selected for further processing, and whose expected values are determined by a threshold function. The lowest of these nonfiltered components is dedicated to the pitch height. The model is designed for tone pairs and provides occurrence probabilities for descending judgments. In a pitch-matching pretest, 12 Shepard tones (generated under a cosine envelope centered at 261 Hz) were compared to pure tones, whose frequencies were adjusted by an up-down staircase method. Matched frequencies corresponded to frequency components but were ambiguous in octave position. In order to test the model, Shepard tones were generated under six cosine envelopes centered over a wide frequency range (65.41, 261, 370, 440, 523.25, 1244.51 Hz). The model predicted pitch class effects and envelope effects. Steep threshold functions caused pronounced pitch class, whereas flat threshold functions caused pronounced envelope effects. The model provides an alternative explanation to the pitch class template theory and serves as a psychoacoustic framework for the perception of Shepard tones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.