ArticleClinical proteomics2018
Quality assessment and interference detection in targeted mass spectrometry data using machine learning.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- MSstatsQC-ML: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Monitor System Suitability and Quality Control in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- MsTargetPeaker: A Quality-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Peak Identification in Targeted Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Article
- Systematic Evaluation of Chromatographic Peak Quality for Targeted Mass Spectrometry via Variational Autoencoder.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- HeapMS: An Automatic Peak-Picking Pipeline for Targeted Proteomic Data Powered by 2D Heatmap Transformation and Convolutional Neural Networks.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Targeted proteomics data interpretation with DeepMRM.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
- MetaMOPE: a web service for mobile phase determination and fast chromatography peaks evaluation for metabolomics.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- IDSL.IPA Characterizes the Organic Chemical Space in Untargeted LC/HRMS Data Sets.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- LC-MS peak assignment based on unanimous selection by six machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- MetaClean: a machine learning-based classifier for reduced false positive peak detection in untargeted LC-MS metabolomics data.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2020Article
- Combining Precursor and Fragment Information for Improved Detection of Differential Abundance in Data Independent Acquisition.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in the field of targeted proteomics and mass spectrometry have significantly improved assay sensitivity and multiplexing capacity. The high-throughput nature of targeted proteomics experiments has increased the rate of data production, which requires development of novel analytical tools to keep up with data processing demand. Currently, development and validation of targeted mass spectrometry assays require manual inspection of chromatographic peaks from large datasets to ensure quality, a process that is time consuming, prone to inter- and intra-operator variability and limits the efficiency of data interpretation from targeted proteomics analyses. To address this challenge, we have developed TargetedMSQC, an R package that facilitates quality control and verification of chromatographic peaks from targeted proteomics datasets. This tool calculates metrics to quantify several quality aspects of a chromatographic peak, e.g. symmetry, jaggedness and modality, co-elution and shape similarity of monitored transitions in a peak group, as well as the consistency of transitions' ratios between endogenous analytes and isotopically labeled internal standards and consistency of retention time across multiple runs. The algorithm takes advantage of supervised machine learning to identify peaks with interference or poor chromatography based on a set of peaks that have been annotated by an expert analyst. Using TargetedMSQC to analyze targeted proteomics data reduces the time spent on manual inspection of peaks and improves both speed and accuracy of interference detection. Additionally, by allowing the analysts to customize the tool for application on different datasets, TargetedMSQC gives the users the flexibility to define the acceptable quality for specific datasets. Furthermore, automated and quantitative assessment of peak quality offers a more objective and systematic framework for high throughput analysis of targeted mass spectrometry assay datasets and is a step towards more robust and faster assay implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.