Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323637›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2018

The role of a best practice alert in the electronic medical record in reducing repetitive lab tests.

Harini Bejjanki, Lazarus K Mramba, Stacy G Beal, Nila Radhakrishnan, Rohit Bishnoi, Chintan Shah, Nikhil Agrawal, Neil Harris, Robert Leverence, Kenneth Rand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Assessing the Frequency of Deferrable Thyroid Nodule Biopsies to De-escalate Low-Value Care.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Harini BejjankiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, dr.harinipal@gmail.com.
Lazarus K MrambaStatistics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Stacy G BealDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, & Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nila RadhakrishnanDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, dr.harinipal@gmail.com.
Rohit BishnoiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, dr.harinipal@gmail.com.
Chintan ShahDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, dr.harinipal@gmail.com.
Nikhil AgrawalDepartment of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neil HarrisDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, & Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Robert LeverenceDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, dr.harinipal@gmail.com.
Kenneth RandDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, & Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recommendations of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's "Choosing Wisely

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of an electronic medical record Best Practice Alert (BPA or "pop up") intervention aimed at reducing duplicate laboratory tests and hospital costs.

designComparison of the number of duplicated laboratory tests performed on inpatients before and after the intervention.

settingUniversity of Florida Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL, USA, during 2014-2017.

interventionThe electronic medical record intervention was a BPA pop-up alert that informed the ordering physician if a recent identical order already existed along with the "ordering time", "collecting time", "resulting time", and the result itself.

main outcome measuresPercentage change in the number of inpatient duplicate orders of selected clinical biochemistry tests and cost savings from reduction of the duplicates. Student's

resultsResults from the beta-binomial model indicated that the intervention reduced the overall duplicates by 18% (OR=0.82, standard error=0.016,

conclusionsThe present study included all hospital inpatients and covered 17 clinical laboratory tests. This rather simple and low-cost intervention resulted in significant reductions in percentage duplicates of several tests and resulted in cost savings. The study also highlights the role of hospitalists in quality improvement.

Indexed as

costshealth carelaboratorytesting

Identifiers

PMID30323637
PMCPMC6181108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.