Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323619›Full record

ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2018

LncRNA as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing Quan, Xiang Pan, Liwen Zhao, Zuwei Li, Kangfu Dai, Fangli Yan, Suyue Liu, Hongfei Ma, Yongqing Lai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. LncRNA-Histone Modification Crosstalk: Orchestrating Cancer Pathobiology.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enhancing mHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Relevance ofCancers · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing QuanDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036, China, yqlord@163.com.
Xiang PanDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036, China, yqlord@163.com.
Liwen ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036, China, yqlord@163.com.
Zuwei LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036, China, yqlord@163.com.
Kangfu DaiGraduate school, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China, yqlord@163.com.
Fangli YanGraduate school, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China, yqlord@163.com.
Suyue LiuGraduate school, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China, yqlord@163.com.
Hongfei MaGraduate school, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China, yqlord@163.com.
Yongqing LaiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036, China, yqlord@163.com.
Anhui Medical University · CNPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer is one of the most common urinary malignancies, and has a high recurrence rate and poor outcomes. In order to identify novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for bladder cancer, we conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the association between long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression and survival in bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched literature from databases using our inclusion and exclusion criteria. STATA 14.0 software was used to analyze the data from collected studies and to construct the forest plots. A different effect size was selected for each meta-analysis.

resultsAfter selection, 30 articles were found to be eligible. The present meta-analysis contains data from 13 articles about clinicopathological characteristics, six articles about diagnosis, and 16 articles about prognosis. In the present study, we found that many lncRNAs could function as potential diagnostic and prognostic markers in bladder cancer. Among these findings, UCA1 was expected to be a diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer, while the aberrant expression of HOTAIR and GAS5 was associated with poor disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival/disease-specific survival.

conclusionOverall, the present study is the first meta-analysis to assess the association between expression of lncRNAs and clinical value in patients with bladder cancer. LncRNAs hold promise as novel diagnostic and prognostic markers in bladder cancer.

Indexed as

bladder cancerclinicopathological characteristicslncRNAprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30323619
PMCPMC6177400
OpenAlexW2895614383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.