Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323403›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2018

The Report of the 2017-2018 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: The Development of the Preceptor Self-Assessment Tool for Entrustable Professional Activities for New Graduates.

Susan S Vos Chair, Meagan M Brown, Elizabeth A Cardello, Matthew R Dintzner, George E MacKinnon, Eric M Maroyka, Peter Mbi, Sharon K Park, Krystalyn K Weaver, Jacqueline M Zeeman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Moving a National Preceptor Development Platform From Design to Reality.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Scoping Review of Pharmacy Preceptor Training Programs.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Susan S Vos ChairThe University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, IA.
Meagan M BrownThe University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Jackson, MS.
Elizabeth A CardelloThe University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Jackson, MS.
Matthew R DintznerWestern New England University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Springfield, MA.
George E MacKinnonMedical College of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Milwaukee, WI.
Eric M MaroykaAmerican Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Bethesda, MD.
Peter MbiUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
Sharon K ParkNotre Dame of Maryland University School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
Krystalyn K WeaverNational Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations, Richmond, VA.
Jacqueline M ZeemanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC.
Lynette R Bradley-BakerAmerican Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Arlington, VA.
Cecilia M PlazaAmerican Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Arlington, VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2017-2018 AACP Professional Affairs Committee addressed the charges of (1) developing a self-reflection/self-assessment tool for pharmacy faculty and preceptors to allow them to assess their capability and confidence with Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) Educational Outcomes, the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP), and the Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for New Pharmacy Graduates and (2) creation of a plan for AACP to utilize in the development of preceptor continuing education and training programs. This report describes the framework, rationale and process for the development of the Preceptor Self-Assessment Tool for Entrustable Professional Activities for New Pharmacy Graduates (PSAE Tool), the pre-test for the PSAE tool, and the online pilot test and its results for the PSAE Tool. The committee provides recommendations for AACP in the continued development and distribution of the PSAE Tool to the schools of pharmacy. Considerations for AACP and the schools of pharmacy to consider in the continuing professional development (CPD) for all preceptors are also discussed. The committee provides a policy statement, adopted by the AACP House of Delegates, regarding the commitment of AACP regarding the CPD for all preceptors. The committee also provides several recommendations to AACP and suggestions to schools of pharmacy and other stakeholder groups pertaining to the committee charges.

Indexed as

Annual Reports as TopicCurriculumEducation, Pharmacy, GraduateFaculty, PharmacyHumansPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPreceptorshipProgram DevelopmentSelf-AssessmentExperiential EducationKEY TERMS: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)PreceptorPreceptor Development

Identifiers

PMID30323403
PMCPMC6181173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.