Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323266›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of gastroenterology2019

Revisiting Montreal: New Insights into Symptoms and Their Causes, and Implications for the Future of GERD.

A Pali S Hungin, Michael Molloy-Bland, Carmelo Scarpignato

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Holistic management of symptomatic reflux: rising to the challenge of proton pump inhibitor overuse.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The tapestry of reflux syndromes: translating new insight into clinical practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A General Overview.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2020
    Review
  20. The Spectrum of Reflux Phenotypes.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A Pali S HunginThe Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Michael Molloy-BlandResearch Evaluation Unit, Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK.
Carmelo ScarpignatoClinical Pharmacology & Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Newcastle University · GBOxford Instruments (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Montreal definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) provided a rationale for acid suppression medication without investigation, thus enhancing the management of the substantial symptom burden in these patients. Increased proton-pump inhibitor use has also highlighted their limitations, with one third of "typical" symptoms known to be refractory. Most refractory symptoms are ascribed to reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH). RH may be caused by impaired esophageal mucosal barrier function and sensitization of peripheral esophageal receptors. Central sensitization may also contribute to the perception of non-pathologic reflux in RH, and the perception of physiological stimuli in FH. Importantly, mechanisms underlying GERD, RH, and FH are (in theory) not mutually exclusive, further complicating patient management. Methods used to distinguish GERD from RH and FH are impractical for use in epidemiological studies and pragmatic care and may have limited diagnostic accuracy. This is impeding accurate prevalence estimates and risk factor determination and the identification of new therapies. Direct assessment of mucosal barrier function by measuring impedance is a promising candidate for improved diagnosis. Ultimately though the concept of GERD as a composite, symptom-based entity needs re-evaluation, so that new understandings of upper GI symptoms can direct more precise management.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationElectric ImpedanceEsophageal MucosaEsophageal pH MonitoringEsophagitis, PepticGastroesophageal RefluxHeartburnHumansProton Pump InhibitorsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30323266
PMCPMC6434899
OpenAlexW2896144798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.