Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323214›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Deep-RBPPred: Predicting RNA binding proteins in the proteome scale based on deep learning.

Jinfang Zheng, Xiaoli Zhang, Xunyi Zhao, Xiaoxue Tong, Xu Hong, Juan Xie, Shiyong Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role of the RNA-Binding Protein Family MEX-3 in Tumorigenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinfang ZhengSchool of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, China.
Xiaoli ZhangSchool of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, China.
Xunyi ZhaoSchool of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, China.
Xiaoxue TongSchool of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, China.
Xu HongSchool of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, China.
Juan Xie
Shiyong LiuSchool of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, China. liushiyong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-5178
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA binding protein (RBP) plays an important role in cellular processes. Identifying RBPs by computation and experiment are both essential. Recently, an RBP predictor, RBPPred, is proposed in our group to predict RBPs. However, RBPPred is too slow for that it needs to generate PSSM matrix as its feature. Herein, based on the protein feature of RBPPred and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), we develop a deep learning model called Deep-RBPPred. With the balance and imbalance training set, we obtain Deep-RBPPred-balance and Deep-RBPPred-imbalance models. Deep-RBPPred has three advantages comparing to previous methods. (1) Deep-RBPPred only needs few physicochemical properties based on protein sequences. (2) Deep-RBPPred runs much faster. (3) Deep-RBPPred has a good generalization ability. In the meantime, Deep-RBPPred is still as good as the state-of-the-art method. Testing in A. thaliana, S. cerevisiae and H. sapiens proteomes, MCC values are 0.82 (0.82), 0.65 (0.69) and 0.85 (0.80) for balance model (imbalance model) when the score cutoff is set to 0.5, respectively. In the same testing dataset, different machine learning algorithms (CNN and SVM) are also compared. The results show that CNN-based model can identify more RBPs than SVM-based. In comparing the balance and imbalance model, both CNN-base and SVM-based tend to favor the majority class in the imbalance set. Deep-RBPPred forecasts 280 (balance model) and 265 (imbalance model) of 299 new RBP. The sensitivity of balance model is about 7% higher than the state-of-the-art method. We also apply deep-RBPPred to 30 eukaryotes and 109 bacteria proteomes downloaded from Uniprot to estimate all possible RBPs. The estimating result shows that rates of RBPs in eukaryote proteomes are much higher than bacteria proteomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerProteomeRNA-Binding ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, ProteinProteomeRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30323214
PMCPMC6189057
OpenAlexW2766234610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.