Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323211›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Prenatal exposure to incubation calls affects song learning in the zebra finch.

Andrew C Katsis, Mzuri H Davies, Katherine L Buchanan, Sonia Kleindorfer, Mark E Hauber, Mylene M Mariette

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The central role of the individual in the history of brains.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Variable ambient temperature promotes song learning and production in zebra finches.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew C KatsisCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. akatsis@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4177-3096
Mzuri H DaviesCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Katherine L BuchananCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Sonia KleindorferCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Mark E HauberDepartment of Animal Biology, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-4928
Mylene M MarietteCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-4111
Deakin University · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Songbirds are important models for understanding the mechanisms and fitness consequences of imitative vocal learning. Although the effects of early-life environmental and social conditions on song learning are well-established, the impact of early sound exposure has received surprisingly little attention. Yet recent evidence hints at auditory sensitivity in songbird embryos, including in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), a classic model species for song learning. Here, we tested whether prenatal exposure to incubation calls-highly rhythmic parental vocalisations produced on the nest-affected song learning in zebra finches. Embryos were exposed in the egg to either incubation (treatment) or contact (control) calls, and after hatching were reared in a large colony. The playback treatment did not affect song complexity nor the accuracy of song copying from the social father, but instead increased learning of non-paternal song syllables. This, in turn, improved males' mounting success in mating trials. These effects may be attributable to changes in juvenile social behaviours, as playback also influenced male behaviour during mating trials. Our study provides the first experimental evidence that prenatal acoustic environment affects song learning and courtship behaviour in songbirds, thereby raising interesting questions on the role of innate versus acquired biases for vocal learning.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsFemaleFinchesLearningMalePregnancyReproductionSocial BehaviorVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID30323211
PMCPMC6189107
OpenAlexW2896280477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.