Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323117›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2018

Roles and functions of Atp6ap2 in the brain.

Alexander Bracke, Oliver von Bohlen Und Halbach

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander BrackeInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Oliver von Bohlen Und HalbachInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classical renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the body has been studied intensively in the last decades, since it is known that this system is involved in the regulation of blood pressure. Since nearly all members of the classical RAS have also been identified within the brain in the last decades and due to the existence of the blood-brain barrier, a RAS within the brain (bRAS) that is largely independent from the peripheral RAS has been postulated. All members of the angiotensin family as e.g., angiotensin II, angiotensin IV and angiotensin II (1-7) along with the respective receptors (e.g., angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1), angiotensin II receptor type 2 (AT2), angiotensin IV receptor (AT4), angiotensin II (1-7) receptor (Mas)) have been identified within the brain. Moreover, a receptor capable of binding renin and the renin precursor prorenin with high affinity has also been detected within the brain. This protein functions as a membrane receptor for (pro)renin and also represents a V-ATPase subunit and is therefore termed (P)RR or Atp6ap2, respectively. In this review we shed light on the (known as well as putative) roles and functions of Atp6ap2 in the brain under physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

Indexed as

adult neurogenesisanimal modelbehaviourhippocampushumanprorenin receptorrenin-angiotensinX-linked intellectual disability

Identifiers

PMID30323117
PMCPMC6199949
OpenAlexW2896450450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.