ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018
Lawful tracking of visual motion in humans, macaques, and marmosets in a naturalistic, continuous, and untrained behavioral context.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Color discrimination in action: High-throughput measurement in immersive VR.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Active gaze behavior organizes V1 activity in freely-moving marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Development of a Marmoset Apparatus for Automated Pulling to study cooperative behaviors.eLife · 2024Article
- Development of a Marmoset Apparatus for Automated Pulling (MarmoAAP) to Study Cooperative Behaviors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- From innate to instructed: A new look at perceptual decision-making.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Continuous psychophysics shows millisecond-scale visual processing delays are faithfully preserved in movement dynamics.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Investigating cross-orientation inhibition with continuous tracking.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Precision and temporal dynamics in heading perception assessed by continuous psychophysics.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Ocular following responses of the marmoset monkey are dependent on postsaccadic delay, spatiotemporal frequency, and saccade direction.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Perceptual consequences of interocular differences in the duration of temporal integration.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics.eLife · 2022Article
- Developmental changes in gaze patterns in response to radial optic flow in toddlerhood and childhood.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Micropursuit and the control of attention and eye movements in dynamic environments.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Look where you go: Characterizing eye movements toward optic flow.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Tracking the Mind's Eye: Primate Gaze Behavior during Virtual Visuomotor Navigation Reflects Belief Dynamics.Neuron · 2020Article
- Rapid assessment of natural visual motion integration across primate species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Much study of the visual system has focused on how humans and monkeys integrate moving stimuli over space and time. Such assessments of spatiotemporal integration provide fundamental grounding for the interpretation of neurophysiological data, as well as how the resulting neural signals support perceptual decisions and behavior. However, the insights supported by classical characterizations of integration performed in humans and rhesus monkeys are potentially limited with respect to both generality and detail: Standard tasks require extensive amounts of training, involve abstract stimulus-response mappings, and depend on combining data across many trials and/or sessions. It is thus of concern that the integration observed in classical tasks involves the recruitment of brain circuits that might not normally subsume natural behaviors, and that quantitative analyses have limited power for characterizing single-trial or single-session processes. Here we bridge these gaps by showing that three primate species (humans, macaques, and marmosets) track the focus of expansion of an optic flow field continuously and without substantial training. This flow-tracking behavior was volitional and reflected substantial temporal integration. Most strikingly, gaze patterns exhibited lawful and nuanced dependencies on random perturbations in the stimulus, such that repetitions of identical flow movies elicited remarkably similar eye movements over long and continuous time periods. These results demonstrate the generality of spatiotemporal integration in natural vision, and offer a means for studying integration outside of artificial tasks while maintaining lawful and highly reliable behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.