Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30322919›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Lawful tracking of visual motion in humans, macaques, and marmosets in a naturalistic, continuous, and untrained behavioral context.

Jonas Knöll, Jonathan W Pillow, Alexander C Huk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Active gaze behavior organizes V1 activity in freely-moving marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Rapid assessment of natural visual motion integration across primate species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas KnöllDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Jonathan W PillowPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Alexander C HukDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; huk@utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

Neural time-integration underlying higher cognitive functionR01EY017366 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HUK, ALEXANDER C, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2008 to 2016
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much study of the visual system has focused on how humans and monkeys integrate moving stimuli over space and time. Such assessments of spatiotemporal integration provide fundamental grounding for the interpretation of neurophysiological data, as well as how the resulting neural signals support perceptual decisions and behavior. However, the insights supported by classical characterizations of integration performed in humans and rhesus monkeys are potentially limited with respect to both generality and detail: Standard tasks require extensive amounts of training, involve abstract stimulus-response mappings, and depend on combining data across many trials and/or sessions. It is thus of concern that the integration observed in classical tasks involves the recruitment of brain circuits that might not normally subsume natural behaviors, and that quantitative analyses have limited power for characterizing single-trial or single-session processes. Here we bridge these gaps by showing that three primate species (humans, macaques, and marmosets) track the focus of expansion of an optic flow field continuously and without substantial training. This flow-tracking behavior was volitional and reflected substantial temporal integration. Most strikingly, gaze patterns exhibited lawful and nuanced dependencies on random perturbations in the stimulus, such that repetitions of identical flow movies elicited remarkably similar eye movements over long and continuous time periods. These results demonstrate the generality of spatiotemporal integration in natural vision, and offer a means for studying integration outside of artificial tasks while maintaining lawful and highly reliable behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsCallithrixEye MovementsHumansMacaca mulattaMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationYoung Adulteye trackingmotionoptic flow

Identifiers

PMID30322919
PMCPMC6217422
OpenAlexW2897782750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.