Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30322908›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Mammalian behavior and physiology converge to confirm sharper cochlear tuning in humans.

Christian J Sumner, Toby T Wells, Christopher Bergevin, Joseph Sollini, Heather A Kreft, Alan R Palmer, Andrew J Oxenham, Christopher A Shera

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How Exceptional Is the Ear?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sensitivity to Frequency Modulation is Limited Centrally.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian J SumnerMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, United Kingdom; christian.sumner2@nottingham.ac.uk.
Toby T WellsMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Christopher BergevinDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Joseph SolliniMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Heather A KreftDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Alan R PalmerMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Andrew J OxenhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-1157
Christopher A SheraCaruso Department of Otolaryngology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Southern California · USYork University · CA

Funding

UNDERSTANDING OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONSR01DC003687 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christopher A Shera · 1999 to 2026
$9.8M
Supplement for temporal bone histological tissue scanning equipmentR01DC012262 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OXENHAM, ANDREW J. · 2013 to 2023
$4.7M
Medical Research Council MC_U135097126Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/5Medical Research Council U135097127NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003687NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequency analysis of sound by the cochlea is the most fundamental property of the auditory system. Despite its importance, the resolution of this frequency analysis in humans remains controversial. The controversy persists because the methods used to estimate tuning in humans are indirect and have not all been independently validated in other species. Some data suggest that human cochlear tuning is considerably sharper than that of laboratory animals, while others suggest little or no difference between species. We show here in a single species (ferret) that behavioral estimates of tuning bandwidths obtained using perceptual masking methods, and objective estimates obtained using otoacoustic emissions, both also employed in humans, agree closely with direct physiological measurements from single auditory-nerve fibers. Combined with human behavioral data, this outcome indicates that the frequency analysis performed by the human cochlea is of significantly higher resolution than found in common laboratory animals. This finding raises important questions about the evolutionary origins of human cochlear tuning, its role in the emergence of speech communication, and the mechanisms underlying our ability to separate and process natural sounds in complex acoustic environments.

Indexed as

AcousticsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochleaHearingHumansMammalsOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPerceptual MaskingSoundauditory nervecochlear tuningfrequency selectivityotoacoustic emissionspsychoacoustics

Identifiers

PMID30322908
PMCPMC6217411
OpenAlexW2896907819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.