Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30322837›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Investigating the Perceptions of Primary Care Dietitians on the Potential for Information Technology in the Workplace: Qualitative Study.

Aimee Jones, Lana J Mitchell, Rochelle O'Connor, Megan E Rollo, Katherine Slater, Lauren T Williams, Lauren Ball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Understanding Primary Care Dietitians' Experiences and Perspectives on Weight Management Practice Using the COM-B Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aimee JonesSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-9334
Lana J MitchellSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4546-6969
Rochelle O'ConnorSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5774-0403
Megan E RolloPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-2063
Katherine SlaterSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-2597
Lauren T WilliamsSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-0319
Lauren BallSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5394-0931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The primary health care setting is an effective avenue for the management and prevention of chronic diseases. Dietitians working in this setting assist with the management of modifiable risk factors of chronic diseases. However, health care professionals report challenges in providing care in this setting because of time and financial constraints. Information technology offers the potential to improve health care quality, safety, efficiency, and cost-efficiency, but there exists limited understanding of dietitians' application of technology in this setting.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of primary care dietitians about using information technology in their workplace.

methodsWe recruited 20 Australian primary care dietitians using purposive and snowball sampling for semistructured telephonic interviews. Interview questions aimed to gain an understanding of dietitians' perceptions about sharing patient outcomes through a national database and the benefits, disadvantages, feasibility, and barriers of using information technology. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed for emerging themes and subthemes. Finally, the technologies used by participants were collated by name and researched for their key attributes.

resultsThe following 4 distinct themes emerged from the data: information technology improving the efficiency of practice tasks, experiencing barriers to using information technology in practice, information technology enhancing outcomes through education and monitoring, and information technology for sharing information with others. Participants identified several advantages and disadvantages of using technology and expressed willingness to share patient outcomes using a Web-based database.

conclusionsThis study suggests that information technology is perceived to have benefits to dietitians and patients in primary health care. However, to achieve the optimal benefit, support is required to overcome barriers to integrate information technology into practice better. Further development of patient management systems and standardized Web-based data collection systems are needed to support better usage by dietitians.

Indexed as

DieteticsFemaleHumansInformation TechnologyMaleNutritionistsQualitative ResearchWorkplacedieteticsinformation technologymobile phoneprimary health careprivate practice

Identifiers

PMID30322837
PMCPMC6231874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.