Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30322833›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Mobile Phone Text Messaging for Tobacco Risk Communication Among Young Adult Community College Students: Protocol and Baseline Overview for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Alexander V Prokhorov, Georges Elias Khalil, Karen Sue Calabro, Tamara Costello Machado, Sophia Russell, Katarzyna W Czerniak, Gabrielle C Botello, Minxing Chen, Adriana Perez, Damon J Vidrine and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03457480 (Informing and Correcting Perceptions Regarding Tobacco Products Among Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03457480 nacompletednot on this map

Informing and Correcting Perceptions Regarding Tobacco Products Among Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2013 to 2021Enrolled781ConditionsHealthy SubjectArmsComputer-Assisted Intervention, Focus Group, Informational Intervention, Survey Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander V ProkhorovDepartment of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-2292
Georges Elias KhalilDepartment of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2870-2365
Karen Sue CalabroDepartment of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-4834
Tamara Costello MachadoDepartment of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-2720
Sophia RussellDepartment of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9251-1099
Katarzyna W CzerniakDepartment of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-0067
Gabrielle C BotelloDepartment of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0093-890X
Minxing ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-8752
Adriana PerezDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health in Austin, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6859-9916
Damon J VidrineDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-796X
Cheryl L PerrySchool of Public Health in Austin, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-1206

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Training & Education Core p335-350P50CA180906 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI PERRY, CHERYL LEE · 2013 to 2017
$19.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-college students are at high risk for tobacco use. Because the use of mobile phone text messaging is nearly ubiquitous today, short message service (SMS) may be an effective strategy for tobacco risk communication in this population. Little is known, however, concerning the message structure significantly influencing perceived tobacco risk.

objectiveWe aim to outline the rationale and design of Project Debunk, a randomized trial comparing the effects of different SMS text message structures.

methodsWe conducted a 6-month randomized trial comparing 8 arms, based on the combination of the 3 message structures delivered to young adults in a 2×2×2 study design: framing (gain-framed or loss-framed), depth (simple or complex), and appeal (emotional or rational). Participants were invited to participate from 3 community colleges in Houston from September 2016 to July 2017. Participants were randomized to 1 arm and received text messages in 2 separate campaigns. Each campaign consisted of 2 text messages per day for 30 days. Perceived tobacco risk was assessed at baseline, 2 months after the first campaign, and 2 months after the second campaign. We assessed the perceived risk of using conventional products (eg, combustible cigarettes) and new and emerging products (eg, electronic cigarettes). The validity of message structures was assessed weekly for each campaign. A 1-week follow-up assessment was also conducted to understand immediate reactions from participants.

resultsWe completed data collection for the baseline survey on a rolling basis during this time and assessed the validity of the message structure after 1 week of SMS text messages. For the entire sample (N=636), the average age was 20.92 years (SD 2.52), about two-thirds were male (430/636, 67.6%), and most were black or African American (259/636, 40.7%) or white (236/636, 37.1%). After 1 week of receiving text messages, the following was noted: (a) loss-framed messages were more likely to be perceived as presenting a loss than gain-framed messages (F

conclusionsThis study confirms that the recruitment, randomization, and message composition have been successfully implemented. Further analyses will identify specific types of messages that are more effective than others in increasing the perceived risk of tobacco use. If our results suggest that any of the 8 specific message structures are more effective for helping young adults understand tobacco risk, this would provide evidence to include such messages as part of a larger technology-based campaign such as mobile phone apps, entertainment-based campaigns, and social media.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03457480; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03457480 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ykd4IIap). REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER: RR1-10.2196/10977.

Indexed as

perceptionrisktext messagingtobacco useyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID30322833
PMCPMC6231779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.