Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30322824›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Psychiatry2018

The benefit of minocycline on negative symptoms of schizophrenia in patients with recent-onset psychosis (BeneMin): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Bill Deakin, John Suckling, Thomas R E Barnes, Kelly Byrne, Imran B Chaudhry, Paola Dazzan, Richard J Drake, Annalisa Giordano, Nusrat Husain, Peter B Jones and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 88 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Bill DeakinNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; MAHSC, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: bill.deakin@manchester.ac.uk.
John SucklingBrain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building for Brain and Mind Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas R E BarnesCentre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kelly ByrneNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Imran B ChaudhryDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Lancashire Care Early Intervention Service, Accrington, UK.
Paola DazzanDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Richard J DrakeDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, Manchester, UK.
Annalisa GiordanoDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Nusrat HusainDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter B JonesBrain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building for Brain and Mind Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Eileen JoyceSobell Department of Motor Neurosciences and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Emma KnoxNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Institute for Applied Clinical Sciences, Keele University, Guy Hilton Research Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Carl KrynickiInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Stephen M LawrieDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Shôn LewisMAHSC, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, Manchester, UK.
Danuta M Lisiecka-FordNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Naghmeh NikkheslatStress, Psychiatry and Immunology Lab & Perinatal Psychiatry, The Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Carmine M ParianteStress, Psychiatry and Immunology Lab & Perinatal Psychiatry, The Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Richard SmallmanNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew WatsonSobell Department of Motor Neurosciences and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Steven C R WilliamsDepartment for Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Rachel UpthegroveInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Graham DunnDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BeneMin Study team
University of Manchester · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601652Medical Research Council G108/603Medical Research Council MC_PC_11003Medical Research Council MR/N029488/1MRF_ C0439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe antibiotic minocycline has neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties that could prevent or reverse progressive neuropathic changes implicated in recent-onset schizophrenia. In the BeneMin study, we aimed to replicate the benefit of minocycline on negative symptoms reported in previous pilot studies, and to understand the mechanisms involved.

methodsIn this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited people with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder that had begun within the past 5 years with continuing positive symptoms from 12 National Health Service (NHS) trusts. Participants were randomly assigned according to an automated permuted blocks algorithm, stratified by pharmacy, to receive minocycline (200 mg per day for 2 weeks, then 300 mg per day for the remainder of the 12-month study period) or matching placebo, which were added to their continuing treatment. The primary clinical outcome was the negative symptom subscale score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales (PANSS) across follow-ups at months 2, 6, 9, and 12. The primary biomarker outcomes were medial prefrontal grey-matter volume, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during a working memory task, and plasma concentration of interleukin 6. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN49141214, and the EU Clinical Trials register (EudraCT) number is 2010-022463-35I.

findingsBetween April 16, 2013, and April 30, 2015, we recruited 207 people and randomly assigned them to receive minocycline (n=104) or placebo (n=103). Compared with placebo, the addition of minocycline had no effect on ratings of negative symptoms (treatment effect difference -0·19, 95% CI -1·23 to 0·85; p=0·73). The primary biomarker outcomes did not change over time and were not affected by minocycline. The groups did not differ in the rate of serious adverse events (n=11 in placebo group and n=18 in the minocycline group), which were mostly due to admissions for worsening psychiatric state (n=10 in the placebo group and n=15 in the minocycline group). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (n=12 in the placebo group, n=19 in the minocycline group), psychiatric (n=16 in placebo group, n=8 in minocycline group), nervous system (n=8 in the placebo group, n=12 in the minocycline group), and dermatological (n=10 in the placebo group, n=8 in the minocycline group).

interpretationMinocycline does not benefit negative or other symptoms of schizophrenia over and above adherence to routine clinical care in first-episode psychosis. There was no evidence of a persistent progressive neuropathic or inflammatory process underpinning negative symptoms. Further trials of minocycline in early psychosis are not warranted until there is clear evidence of an inflammatory process, such as microgliosis, against which minocycline has known efficacy.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme, an MRC and NIHR partnership.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMinocyclineNeuroprotective AgentsPsychotic DisordersAnti-Bacterial AgentsMinocyclineNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID30322824
PMCPMC6206257
OpenAlexW2896834526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.