Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30322648›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2018

Assessment of quality of primary care with facility surveys: a descriptive analysis in ten low-income and middle-income countries.

Erlyn K Macarayan, Anna D Gage, Svetlana V Doubova, Frederico Guanais, Ephrem T Lemango, Youssoupha Ndiaye, Peter Waiswa, Margaret E Kruk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Population assessment of health system performance in 16 countries.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erlyn K MacarayanDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: emacarayan@hsph.harvard.edu.
Anna D GageDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Svetlana V DoubovaEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico.
Frederico GuanaisDivision of Social Protection and Health, Inter-American Development Bank, Lima, Peru.
Ephrem T LemangoMaternal and Child Health Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Youssoupha NdiayePlanning, Research, and Statistics, Ministry of Health and Social Action, Dakar, Senegal.
Peter WaiswaDepartment of Public Health Sciences-Global Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Maternal and Newborn Centre of Excellence, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda; INDEPTH Network Maternal and Newborn Working Group, Iganga-Mayuge Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Iganga, Uganda.
Margaret E KrukDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care has the potential to address a large proportion of people's health needs, promote equity, and contain costs, but only if it provides high-quality health services that people want to use. 40 years after the Declaration of Alma-Ata, little is known about the quality of primary care in low-income and middle-income countries. We assessed whether existing facility surveys capture relevant aspects of primary care performance and summarised the quality of primary care in ten low-income and middle-income countries.

methodsWe used Service Provision Assessment surveys, the most comprehensive nationally representative surveys of health systems, to select indicators corresponding to three of the process quality domains (competent systems, evidence-based care, and user experience) identified by the Lancet Global Health Commission on High Quality Health Systems in the Sustainable Development Goals Era. We calculated composite and domain quality scores for first-level primary care facilities across and within ten countries with available facility assessment data (Ethiopia, Haiti, Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Nepal, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda).

findingsData were available for 7049 facilities and 63 869 care visits. There were gaps in measurement of important outcomes such as user experience, health outcomes, and confidence, and processes such as timely action, choice of provider, affordability, ease of use, dignity, privacy, non-discrimination, autonomy, and confidentiality. No information about care competence was available outside maternal and child health. Overall, scores for primary care quality were low (mean 0·41 on a scale of 0 to 1). At a domain level, scores were lowest for user experience, followed by evidence-based care, and then competent systems. At the subdomain level, scores for patient focus, prevention and detection, technical quality of sick-child care, and population-health management were lower than those for other subdomains.

interpretationFacility surveys do not capture key elements of primary care quality. The available measures suggest major gaps in primary care quality. If not addressed, these gaps will limit the contribution of primary care to reaching the ambitious Sustainable Development Goals.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth Care SurveysPrimary Health CareHumansQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30322648
PMCPMC6187280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.