Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30322098›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

The Application of Supercritical Fluid Extraction in Phenolic Compounds Isolation from Natural Plant Materials.

Katarzyna Tyśkiewicz, Marcin Konkol, Edward Rój

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unlocking the Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Comprehensive Review of Phenolic Compounds in Horticultural Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Supercritical COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Chemical profile ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
  14. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Supercritical COScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna TyśkiewiczSupercritical Extraction Department, New Chemical Syntheses Institute, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 13A, 24-110 Puławy, Poland. katarzyna.tyskiewicz@ins.pulawy.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-8672
Marcin KonkolSupercritical Extraction Department, New Chemical Syntheses Institute, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 13A, 24-110 Puławy, Poland. marcin.konkol@ins.pulawy.pl.
Edward RójSupercritical Extraction Department, New Chemical Syntheses Institute, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 13A, 24-110 Puławy, Poland. edward.roj@ins.pulawy.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-8691-3315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The separation of phenolic compounds by supercritical fluid extraction has been widely studied throughout the last two decades. This is evidenced by a number of publications and articles. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has become thus the effective method of separating the mentioned group of compounds. On the other hand, SFE is a beneficial approach in plant waste materials utilization and reduction of environmental burdens caused by the wastes. The aim of the study is to gather and systematize available information on the phenolic compounds separation that have been reported so far as well as to evaluate whether there is one optimal supercritical fluid extraction method for the phenolic compounds.

Indexed as

Chromatography, Supercritical FluidOils, VolatilePhenolsPhytochemicalsPlantsOils, VolatilePhenolsPhytochemicalsanthocyaninscarbon dioxideextraction techniquesflavonoidsphenolic compounds

Identifiers

PMID30322098
PMCPMC6222308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.