Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30321663›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2019

Impact of chelation timing on gadolinium deposition in rats after contrast administration.

John P Prybylski, Carla Coste Sanchez, Michael Jay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John P PrybylskiDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Carla Coste SanchezDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Michael JayDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: mjay@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Orally Bioavailable Gadolinium Chelators for Preventing and Ameliorating Toxicity Due to MRI Contrast AgentsR41CA203571 · NCI · CAPTURE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC · PI JAY, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2016
$206k
Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain Following Administration of MRI Contrast Agents: Mechanism of Uptake, Determination of Gd Species and Relation to ExtravasationF32GM125197 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PRYBYLSKI, JOHN PATRICK · 2017 to 2018
$127k
NCI NIH HHS R41 CA203571NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM125197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if gadolinium (Gd) can be rechelated once released from Gd-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and deposited in vivo. Despite extensive research comparing GBCAs and GBCA formulations as well as the ongoing debate about their risks of deposition and the role of Gd release, it remains unknown if retained Gd can be eliminated by administering chelating agents. MATERIALS AND

methodsRats were injected intravenously with 10 doses of 1 mmol/kg gadodiamide and treated with intravenous Zn-DTPA (30 μmol/kg) concomitantly or 1, 4 or 8 h after GBCA administration (N = 3 rats per group). After euthanization, tissues were harvested three days after the last dose of gadodiamide and tissue Gd concentrations were assessed by ICP-MS. Additionally, a simulation of a single 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dose with 30 μmol/kg DTPA given either concomitantly or within the first 24 h after GBCA was run; simulated tissue Gd concentrations were compared with those observed in rats to determine if simulated trends were accurate.

resultsConcomitant DTPA did not produce a significant reduction in Gd concentration in any organ for rats. There was a time-dependent trend in liver Gd reduction. The 1 h timepoint was associated with a non-significant increase in kidney, brain and femur Gd relative to untreated controls. There were no significant deviations from the model-predicted Gd changes. DISCUSSION: Both the simulation and rat study did not identify major benefits for chelation at the doses given, despite the simulation assuming all Gd deposited in tissues is unchelated. The potential redistribution in the rat study provide a compelling result that may impact the clinical relevance of further work investigating rechelation of Gd. Future work should further describe the three-dimensional dose-time-response relationship for preventing Gd deposition, and how that relates to long-term Gd toxicities.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainChelating AgentsContrast MediaDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverPentetic AcidRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyChelating AgentsContrast MediagadodiamideGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAPentetic AcidChelationContrast agentsDepositionGadoliniumModelingMRI

Identifiers

PMID30321663
PMCPMC6263939
OpenAlexW2895854599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.