Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30321594›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2018

Comparing cryo-EM structures.

Catherine L Lawson, Wah Chiu

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Validation of electron-microscopy maps using solution small-angle X-ray scattering.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Using deep-learning predictions of inter-residue distances for model validation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Atomic model validation using the CCP-EM software suite.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Three-dimensional Structure Databases of Biological Macromolecules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Protein storytelling through physics.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine L LawsonInstitute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. Electronic address: cathy.lawson@rutgers.edu.
Wah ChiuDivision of Cryo-EM and Bioimaging, SSRL, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: wahc@stanford.edu.

Funding

Unified Data Resource for Large Complexes Determined by Cryo-Electron MicroscopyR01GM079429 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHIU, WAH · 2007 to 2021
$11.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Consensus Statements as TopicApoferritinsCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationTRPV Cation ChannelsApoferritinsTRPV1 protein, humanTRPV Cation Channels

Identifiers

PMID30321594
PMCPMC6464812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.