Observational studyAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2019
Risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status: a US study in 8 states.
Observational study in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- SART CORS IVF registry: looking to the past to shape future perspectives.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Birth outcomes in single motherhood 'by choice': a register study of children conceived through medically assisted reproduction.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Genetic Cardiomyopathies and Pregnancy.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at admission helps to predict the need for blood transfusion after vaginal delivery.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of duration of embryo culture with risk of large for gestational age delivery in cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles.Fertility and sterility · 2024Article
- Severe Maternal Morbidity in Twins.American journal of perinatology · 2023Article
- Made, Not Begotten: IVF and the Right to Life Under Conditions.The Linacre quarterly · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction index for severe maternal morbidity based on preconception comorbidities among infertile patients.Fertility and sterility · 2021Observational
- Severe Maternal Morbidity: A Comparison of Definitions and Data Sources.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- A scoping review of severe maternal morbidity: describing risk factors and methodological approaches to inform population-based surveillance.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2021Article
- The risk of birth defects with conception by ART.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Defining critical factors in multi-country studies of assisted reproductive technologies (ART): data from the US and UK health systems.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- In vitro fertilization and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: associations with treatment parameters.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia-and What Else?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2019
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver the past 2 decades the characteristics of women giving birth in the United States and the nature of the births themselves have changed dramatically, with increases in older maternal age, plural births, cesarean deliveries, and conception from infertility treatment.
objectiveWe sought to evaluate the risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status, and for in vitro fertilization pregnancies, by oocyte source and embryo state combinations. STUDY
designWomen in 8 states who underwent in vitro fertilization cycles resulting in a live birth during 2004 through 2013 were linked to their infant's birth certificates; a 10:1 sample of births from non-in vitro fertilization deliveries were selected for comparison; those with an indication of infertility treatment on the birth certificate were categorized as subfertile, all others were categorized as fertile. In vitro fertilization pregnancies were additionally categorized by oocyte source (autologous vs donor) and embryo state (fresh vs thawed). Maternal morbidity was identified from the birth certificate, modeled using logistic regression, and reported as adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]. The reference group was fertile women.
resultsThe study population included 1,477,522 pregnancies (1,346,118 fertile, 11,298 subfertile, 80,254 in vitro fertilization autologous-fresh, 21,964 in vitro fertilization autologous-thawed, 13,218 in vitro fertilization donor-fresh, and 4670 in vitro fertilization donor-thawed pregnancies): 1,420,529 singleton, 54,573 twin, and 2420 triplet+ pregnancies. Compared to fertile women, subfertile and the 4 groups of in vitro fertilization-treated women had increased risks for blood transfusion and third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (subfertile, 1.58 [1.23-2.02] and 2.08 [1.79-2.43]; autologous-fresh, 1.33 [1.14-1.54] and 1.37 [1.26-1.49]; autologous-thawed, 1.94 [1.60-2.36] and 2.10 [1.84-2.40]; donor-fresh, 2.16 [1.69-2.75] and 2.11 [1.66-2.69]; and donor-thawed, 2.01 [1.38-2.92] and 1.28 [0.79-2.08]). Also compared to fertile women, the risk of unplanned hysterectomy was increased for in vitro fertilization-treated women in the autologous-thawed group (2.80 [1.96-4.00]), donor-fresh group (2.14 [1.33-3.44]), and the donor-thawed group (2.46 [1.33-4.54]). The risk of ruptured uterus was increased for in vitro fertilization-treated women in the autologous-fresh group (1.62 [1.14-2.29]). Among women with a prior birth, the risk of blood transfusion after a vaginal birth was increased for subfertile women (2.91 [1.38-6.15]), and women in all 4 in vitro fertilization groups (autologous-fresh, 1.93 [1.23-3.01]; autologous-thawed, 2.99 [1.78-5.02]; donor-fresh, 5.13 [2.39-11.02]; and donor-thawed, 5.20 [1.83-14.82]); the risk after a cesarean delivery was increased in the autologous-thawed group (1.74 [1.29-2.33]) and the donor-fresh group (1.62 [1.07-2.45]). Unplanned hysterectomy was increased in the autologous-thawed (2.31 [1.43-3.71]) and donor-thawed (2.45 [1.06-5.67]) groups.
conclusionThe risks of severe maternal morbidity are increased for subfertile and in vitro fertilization births, particularly in pregnancies that are not from autologous, fresh cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.