ArticleJournal of animal science2019
Body condition of late pregnant gilts affects the expression of selected adipokines and their receptors in mammary fat and backfat tissues.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of body condition in late gestating gilts on gene expression of selected adipokines and their receptors in backfat and mammary fat tissues was studied. The presence of associations between mammary gland composition variables and the mRNA abundance of selected genes and serum concentrations of adiponectin and leptin was also investigated. A total of 45 gilts were selected at mating based on their backfat depth and were allocated to three groups: (1) low backfat (LBF; 12-15 mm; n = 14), (2) medium backfat (MBF; 17-19 mm; n = 15), and (3) high backfat (HBF; 22-26 mm; n = 16). Gilts were fed different amounts of a conventional diet to maintain differences in backfat depth throughout the gestation period. Blood samples were collected at day 109 of gestation to measure adiponectin and leptin serum concentrations. Gilts were slaughtered on day 110 of gestation, and mammary glands were collected to determine mammary composition. Mammary fat and backfat tissues were also sampled to measure the mRNA abundance of selected genes. In mammary fat tissue, there was an effect of body condition on the prolactin (PRL; P = 0.01), adiponutrin (PNPLA3; P < 0.10), and prolactin receptor long form (PRLR-LF; P < 0.10) genes. There was a greater PRL mRNA abundance in mammary fat tissue from HBF than LBF or MBF gilts (P < 0.05). The PNPLA3 mRNA abundance was lower in HBF than in MBF gilts (P < 0.05), and that of PRLR-LF was lower in LBF than in HBF gilts (P < 0.05). In backfat, body condition affected the mRNA abundance of leptin (P < 0.05) and PNPLA3 (P < 0.01), with the greatest expression levels being observed in HBF gilts for both genes. Association analyses suggest a detrimental effect of high circulating leptin concentrations on gilts mammary development, as reflected by the negative correlations between serum leptin and protein percent (r = -0.66, P < 0.01), and concentrations of DNA (r = -0.62, P < 0.01) and RNA (r = -0.60, P < 0.01) in mammary parenchyma. Current results show that body condition of gilts at the end of gestation can affect the expression of adipokines in mammary fat and backfat tissues, with a different regulation of transcript abundance being observed in these two fat depots. Results also suggest that circulating leptin is strongly associated with mammary gland composition of late pregnant gilts, whereas locally synthesized leptin from mammary fat tissue is not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.