Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30321324›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Three New Genome Assemblies Support a Rapid Radiation in Musa acuminata (Wild Banana).

Mathieu Rouard, Gaetan Droc, Guillaume Martin, Julie Sardos, Yann Hueber, Valentin Guignon, Alberto Cenci, Björn Geigle, Mark S Hibbins, Nabila Yahiaoui and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Banana breeding by genome design.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Chromosome-level genome assemblies ofHorticulture research · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mathieu RouardBioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, France.
Gaetan DrocCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Guillaume MartinCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Julie SardosBioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, France.
Yann HueberBioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, France.
Valentin GuignonBioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, France.
Alberto CenciBioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, France.
Björn GeigleComputomics GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany.
Mark S HibbinsDepartment of Biology, Indiana University.
Nabila YahiaouiCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Franc-Christophe BaurensCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Vincent BerryLIRMM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Matthew W HahnDepartment of Biology, Indiana University.
Angelique D'HontCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas RouxBioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edible bananas result from interspecific hybridization between Musa acuminata and Musa balbisiana, as well as among subspecies in M. acuminata. Four particular M. acuminata subspecies have been proposed as the main contributors of edible bananas, all of which radiated in a short period of time in southeastern Asia. Clarifying the evolution of these lineages at a whole-genome scale is therefore an important step toward understanding the domestication and diversification of this crop. This study reports the de novo genome assembly and gene annotation of a representative genotype from three different subspecies of M. acuminata. These data are combined with the previously published genome of the fourth subspecies to investigate phylogenetic relationships. Analyses of shared and unique gene families reveal that the four subspecies are quite homogenous, with a core genome representing at least 50% of all genes and very few M. acuminata species-specific gene families. Multiple alignments indicate high sequence identity between homologous single copy-genes, supporting the close relationships of these lineages. Interestingly, phylogenomic analyses demonstrate high levels of gene tree discordance, due to both incomplete lineage sorting and introgression. This pattern suggests rapid radiation within Musa acuminata subspecies that occurred after the divergence with M. balbisiana. Introgression between M. a. ssp. malaccensis and M. a. ssp. burmannica was detected across the genome, though multiple approaches to resolve the subspecies tree converged on the same topology. To support evolutionary and functional analyses, we introduce the PanMusa database, which enables researchers to exploration of individual gene families and trees.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPhylogenyDatabases as TopicMultigene FamilyMusa

Identifiers

PMID30321324
PMCPMC6282646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.