Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30321314›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Impact of Next-generation Sequencing Defined Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pretreatment Drug Resistance on Virological Outcomes in the ANRS 12249 Treatment-as-Prevention Trial.

Anne Derache, Collins C Iwuji, Kathy Baisley, Siva Danaviah, Anne-Geneviève Marcelin, Vincent Calvez, Tulio de Oliveira, François Dabis, Kholoud Porter, Deenan Pillay

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01509508 (A Cluster Randomised Trial Comparing the Impact of Immediate Versus South African Recommendations Guided ART Initiation on HIV Incidence. The ARNS 12249 TasP), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01509508 nacompletednot on this map

A Cluster Randomised Trial Comparing the Impact of Immediate Versus South African Recommendations Guided ART Initiation on HIV Incidence. The ARNS 12249 TasP (Treatment as Prevention) Trial in Hlabisa Sub-district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

TypeinterventionalSponsorANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesRan2012 to 2016Enrolled28,153ConditionsHIV InfectionArmsImmediate ARV treatment initiation with TDF/FTC/EFV, South African recommendation guided ARV (TDF/FTC/EFV) initiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne DeracheAfrica Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa.
Collins C IwujiAfrica Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa.
Kathy BaisleySorbonne University, l'université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Paris, France.
Siva DanaviahAfrica Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa.
Anne-Geneviève MarcelinSorbonne University, l'université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Paris, France.
Vincent CalvezSorbonne University, l'université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Paris, France.
Tulio de OliveiraKwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
François DabisUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut de Santé Publique d'Epidémiologie et de Développement, Centre Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale 1219, France.
Kholoud PorterInstitute for Global Health, University College London, United Kingdom.
Deenan PillayAfrica Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa.
Sorbonne Université · FRAfrica Health Research Institute · ZABrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals on thymidine analogue backbone antiretroviral therapy (ART) with either nevirapine or efavirenz have suggested poorer virological outcomes in the presence of pretreatment drug resistance (PDR). We assessed the impact of PDR on virological suppression (VS; <50 copies/mL) in individuals prescribed primarily tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz in rural KwaZulu-Natal within a treatment-as-prevention trial.

methodsAmong 1557 HIV-positive individuals who reported no prior ART at study entry and provided plasma samples, 1328 individuals with entry viral load (VL) >1000 copies/mL had next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the HIV pol gene with MiSeq technology. Results were obtained for 1148 individuals, and the presence of PDR was assessed at 5% and 20% detection thresholds. Virological outcome was assessed using Cox regression in 837 of 920 ART initiators with at least 1 follow-up VL after ART initiation.

resultsPDR prevalence was 9.5% (109/1148) and 12.8% (147/1148) at 20% and 5% thresholds, respectively. After a median of 1.36 years (interquartile range, 0.91-2.13), mostly on fixed-dose combination tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz, presence of both nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor PDR vs no PDR was associated with longer time to VS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.86), while there was no difference between those with only NNRTI PDR vs no PDR (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82-1.34) at the 5% threshold. Similar differences were observed for mutations detected at the 20% threshold, although without statistical significance.

conclusionsNGS uncovered a high prevalence of PDR among participants enrolled in trial clinics in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Dual-class PDR to a mainly tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz regimen was associated with poorer VS. However, there was no impact of NNRTI PDR alone. CLINICAL TRIALS TEGISTRATION: NCT01509508; South African National Clinical Trials Register: DOH-27-0512-3974.

Indexed as

Microbial Sensitivity TestsSustained Virologic ResponseViral LoadAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-HIV AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicFemaleGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-HIV Agentspol Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virusantiretroviral therapyHIVnext-generation sequencingpretreatment drug resistancevirological response

Identifiers

PMID30321314
PMCPMC6603266
OpenAlexW2896615022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.