Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30321264›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Expanded functionality, increased accuracy, and enhanced speed in the de novo genotyping-by-sequencing pipeline GBS-SNP-CROP.

Arthur T O Melo, Iago Hale

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence of Asexual Overwintering ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arthur T O MeloDepartment of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Food Systems, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Iago HaleDepartment of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Food Systems, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryGBS-SNP-CROP is a bioinformatics pipeline originally developed to support the cost-effective genome-wide characterization of plant genetic resources through paired-end genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), particularly in the absence of a reference genome. Since its 2016 release, the pipeline's functionality has greatly expanded, its computational efficiency has improved, and its applicability to a broad set of genomic studies for both plants and animals has been demonstrated. This note details the suite of improvements to date, as realized in GBS-SNP-CROP v.4.0, with specific attention paid to a new integrated metric that facilitates reliable variant identification despite the complications of homologs. Using the new de novo GBS read simulator GBS-Pacecar, also introduced in this note, results show an improvement in overall pipeline accuracy from 66% (v.1.0) to 84% (v.4.0), with a time saving of ∼70%. Both GBS-SNP-CROP versions significantly outperform TASSEL-UNEAK; and v.4.0 resolves the issue of non-overlapping variant calls observed between UNEAK and v.1.0. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GBS-SNP-CROP source code and user manual are available at https://github.com/halelab/GBS-SNP-CROP. The GBS read simulator GBS-Pacecar is available at https://github.com/halelab/GBS-Pacecar. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsGenome, PlantGenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID30321264
PMCPMC6513162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.