Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30321239›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2018

The cellular phenotype of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens in the light of cidB diversity.

Manon Bonneau, Frédéric Landmann, Pierrick Labbé, Fabienne Justy, Mylène Weill, Mathieu Sicard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Combining transinfectedProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nanopore sequencing of PCR products enables multicopy gene family reconstruction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manon BonneauISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric LandmannCRBM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Pierrick LabbéISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0806-1919
Fabienne JustyISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Mylène WeillISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Mathieu SicardISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3692-0039
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia are maternally inherited endosymbiotic bacteria, widespread among arthropods thanks to host reproductive manipulations that increase their prevalence into host populations. The most commonly observed manipulation is cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). CI leads to embryonic death in crosses between i) infected males and uninfected females and ii) individuals infected with incompatible Wolbachia strains. CI can be conceptualized as a toxin-antidote system where a toxin deposited by Wolbachia in the sperm would induce embryonic death unless countered by an antidote produced by Wolbachia present in the eggs. In Drosophila melanogaster, transgenic expression of Wolbachia effector cidB revealed its function of CI-inducing toxin. Moreover in Culex pipiens, the diversity of cidB variants present in wPip strains accounts for the diversity in crossing-types. We conducted cytological analyses to determine the CI mechanisms that lead to embryonic death in C. pipiens, and assess whether diversity in crossing-types could be based on variations in these mechanisms. We revealed that paternal chromatin condensation and segregation defects during the first embryonic division are always responsible for embryonic death. The strongest observed defects lead to an exclusion of the paternal chromatin from the first zygotic division, resulting in haploid embryos unable to hatch. The proportion of unhatched haploid embryos, developing with only maternal chromatin, which reflects the frequency of strong defects can be considered as a proxy of CI intensity at the cellular level. We thus studied the putative effect of variations in crossing types and cidB diversification on CI defects intensity. Incompatible crosses involving distinct wPip strains revealed that CI defects intensity depends on the Wolbachia strains hosted by the males and is linked to the diversity of cidB genes harbored in their genomes. These results support that, additionally to its implication in C. pipiens crossing type variability, cidB diversification also influences the strength of CI embryonic defects.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBacterial ProteinsCulexCytoplasmDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHost SpecificityMalePhenotypeSymbiosisWolbachiaBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30321239
PMCPMC6201942
OpenAlexW2897067836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.