ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2018
When is the rat retrosplenial cortex required for stimulus integration?
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Every-Other-Day Feeding Prevents the Loss of Parvalbumin-Expressing Neurons in the Cerebral Cortex of Female 5xFAD Mice.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Differences in Learning Strategy Selection and Object Location Memory Impairments in APP/PS1 Mice.Experimental neurobiology · 2025Article
- Article
- The retrosplenial cortex as a possible "sensory integration" area: A neural network modeling approach of the differential outcomes effect in negative patterning.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2021Article
- A model of head direction and landmark coding in complex environments.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Cortical Contributions to Higher-Order Conditioning: A Review of Retrosplenial Cortex Function.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Review
- Retrosplenial cortex damage impairs unimodal sensory preconditioning.Behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- Retrosplenial cortex and its role in cue-specific learning and memory.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Review
- Permanent damage or temporary silencing of retrosplenial cortex impairs the expression of a negative patterning discrimination.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rodent retrosplenial cortex is known to be vital for spatial cognition, but evidence has also pointed to a role in processing nonspatial information. It has been suggested that the retrosplenial cortex may serve as a site of integration of incoming sensory information. To examine this proposal, the current set of experiments assessed the impact of excitotoxic lesions in the retrosplenial cortex on two behavioral tasks that tax animals' ability to process multiple and overlapping environmental stimuli. In Experiment 1, rats with retrosplenial lesions acquired a negative patterning discrimination, a form of configural learning that can be solved only by learning the conjunction of cues. Subsequent transfer tests confirmed that both the lesion and control animals had solved the task by using configural representations. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, a 2nd cohort of retrosplenial lesion animals successfully acquired conditioned inhibition. Nevertheless, the same animals failed a subsequent summation test that assesses the ability to transfer what has been learned about one stimulus to another stimulus in the absence of reinforcement. Taken together, these results suggest that in the nonspatial domain, the retrosplenial cortex is not required for forming associations between multiple or overlapping environmental stimuli and, consequently, retrosplenial engagement in such processes is more selective than was previously envisaged. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.