Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30320962›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology progress2019

Cathepsin L Causes Proteolytic Cleavage of Chinese-Hamster-Ovary Cell Expressed Proteins During Processing and Storage: Identification, Characterization, and Mitigation.

Haibin Luo, Liu Tie, Mingyan Cao, Alan K Hunter, Timothy M Pabst, Jiali Du, Raymond Field, Yuling Li, William K Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology progress, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Haibin LuoPurification Process Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.ORCID 0000-0001-5964-567X
Liu TieAnalytical Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
Mingyan CaoAnalytical Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
Alan K HunterPurification Process Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
Timothy M PabstPurification Process Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
Jiali DuFormulation Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
Raymond FieldCell Culture and Fermentation Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Cambridge CB21 6GH, U.K.
Yuling LiPurification Process Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
William K WangPurification Process Sciences, Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
Amplimmune (United States) · USAltimmune (United States) · USInstitute for Fermentation · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A stochastic approach of copurification of the protease Cathepsin L that results in product fragmentation during purification processing and storage is presented. Cathepsin L was identified using mass spectroscopy, characterization of proteolytic activity, and comparison with fragmentation patterns observed using recombinant Cathepsin L. Cathepsin L existed in Chinese hamster ovary cell culture fluids obtained from cell lines expressing different products and cleaved a variety of recombinant proteins including monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, bispecific antibodies, and fusion proteins. Therefore, characterization its chromatographic behavior is essential to ensure robust manufacturing and sufficient shelf life. The chromatographic behaviors of Cathepsin L using a variety of techniques including affinity, cation exchange, anion exchange, and mixed mode chromatography were systematically evaluated. Our data demonstrates that copurification of Cathepsin L on nonaffinity modalities is principally because of similar retention on the stationary phase and not through interactions with product. Lastly, Cathespin L exhibits a broad elution profile in cation exchange chromatography (CEX) likely because of its different forms. Affinity purification is free of fragmentation issue, making affinity capture the best mitigation of Cathepsin L. When affinity purification is not feasible, a high pH wash on CEX can effectively remove Cathepsin L but resulted in significant product loss, while anion exchange chromatography operated in flow-through mode does not efficiently remove Cathepsin L. Mixed mode chromatography, using Capto™ adhere in this example, provides robust clearance over wide process parameter range (pH 7.7 ± 0.3 and 100 ± 50 mM NaCl), making it an ideal technique to clear Cathepsin L. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 35: e2732, 2019.

Indexed as

AnimalsCathepsin LCHO CellsChromatography, AffinityChromatography, Ion ExchangeCricetinaeCricetulusHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationProteolysisProteomicsRecombinant ProteinsCathepsin LRecombinant ProteinsCathepsin Lcopurificationcysteine proteasefragmentationhost cell proteins

Identifiers

PMID30320962
PMCPMC6587562
OpenAlexW2896366245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.