Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30320525›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2018

Recommendations for the Appropriate Structure, Communication, and Investigation of Tobacco Harm Reduction Claims. An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Frank T Leone, Kai-Håkon Carlsen, David Chooljian, Laura E Crotty Alexander, Frank C Detterbeck, Michelle N Eakin, Sarah Evers-Casey, Harold J Farber, Patricia Folan, Hasmeena Kathuria and 11 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Vaping-Induced Proteolysis Causes Airway Surface Dehydration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. What are the respiratory effects of e-cigarettes?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Frank T Leone
Kai-Håkon CarlsenORCID 0000-0002-3026-8521
David Chooljian
Laura E Crotty AlexanderORCID 0000-0002-5091-2660
Frank C Detterbeck
Sarah Evers-Casey
Harold J Farber
Patricia Folan
Hasmeena KathuriaORCID 0000-0002-9062-409X
Karen Latzka
Shane McDermott
Sharon McGrath-MorrowORCID 0000-0002-1576-5394
Farzad Moazed
Alfred Munzer
Enid Neptune
David P L Sachs
Jonathan Samet
Beth Sufian
Dona Upson

Funding

Resolution of Diffuse Inflammatory Lung Injury in Neonatal MiceR01HL114800 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCGRATH-MORROW, SHARON ANN · 2013 to 2021
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe tobacco harm reduction literature is replete with vague language, far-reaching claims, and unwarranted certainty. The American Thoracic Society has increasingly recognized the need for a framework for reliably making such claims. Evidence-based standards improving the scientific value and transparency of harm reduction claims are expected to improve their trustworthiness, clarity, and consistency.

methodsExperts from relevant American Thoracic Society committees identified key topic areas for discussion. Literature search strategy included English language articles across Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Collaborative databases, with expanded search terms including tobacco, addiction, smoking, cigarettes, nicotine, and harm reduction. Workgroup members synthesized their evidentiary summaries into a list of candidate topics suitable for inclusion in the final report. Breakout groups developed detailed content maps of each topic area, including points to be considered for suggested recommendations. Successive draft recommendations were modified using an iterative consensus process until unanimous approval was achieved. Patient representatives ensured the document's relevance to the lay public.

resultsFifteen recommendations were identified, organized into four framework elements dealing with: estimating harm reduction among individuals, making claims on the basis of population impact, appropriately careful use of language, and ethical considerations in harm reduction. DISCUSSION: This statement clarifies important principles guiding valid direct and inferential harm reduction claims. Ideals for effective communication with the lay public and attention to unique ethical concerns are also delineated. The authors call for formal systems of grading harm reduction evidence and regulatory assurances of longitudinal surveillance systems to document the impact of harm reduction policies.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionHealth CommunicationHealth PolicyHumansNicotianaSmokingSocieties, MedicalUnited Statesaddictione-cigarettespreventionsmokingtobacco dependence

Identifiers

PMID30320525
PMCPMC6943880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.