SynthesisOncology reports2019
The diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs as a biomarker for gastric cancer: A meta‑analysis.
Synthesis in Oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of circulating lncRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- PIWI family proteins as prognostic markers in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Pooled it
- Identification of Circulating MicroRNAs as a Promising Diagnostic Biomarker for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Early Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Pooled it
- The Diagnostic Value of MicroRNAs as a Biomarker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2019Pooled it
- Review
- Role of circulating tumor DNA methylation in gastric cancer initiation and progression: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- MicroRNA-Mediated Regulatory Networks inBiochemistry research international · 2025Review
- The current and future incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in 185 countries, 2020-40: A population-based modelling study.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- NcRNA-mediated upregulation of CAMK2N1 is associated with poor prognosis and tumor immune infiltration of gastric cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Multi-Omics Analysis of Molecular Characteristics and Carcinogenic Effect of NFE2L3 in Pan-Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Determining The Role of MicroRNAs in Self-Renewal, Metastasis and Resistance to Drugs in Human Gastric Cancer Based on Data Mining Approaches: A Systematic Review.Cell journal · 2022Review
- Article
- Identifying Potential miRNA Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Diagnosis Using Machine Learning Variable Selection Approach.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-92a in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2021Article
- Potential diagnostic value of circulating miRNA for multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis.Journal of bone oncology · 2020Review
- MicroRNA-19b-3p suppresses gastric cancer development by negatively regulating neuropilin-1.Cancer cell international · 2020Article
- Identification of Serum Circulating MicroRNAs as Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers of Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Gastric cancer risk stratification and surveillance after Helicobacter pylori eradication: 2020.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2019Article
- A Panel of Circulating microRNAs as a Potential Biomarker for the Early Detection of Gastric Cancer.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, cancer research microRNA studies have drawn great attention. However, the results of these studies have been inconsistent and variable regarding the availability of circulating miRNAs in gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis. Thus, results should be interpreted cautiously. The purpose of the present study was to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs in GC diagnosis. We conducted a systematic and comprehensive approach for the inclusion of studies. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were pooled with random effects models, and a summary of receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted. The potential heterogeneity was assessed with Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses and meta‑regressions further investigated the sources of heterogeneity. A total of 77 studies from 48 articles were eligible for the meta‑analysis. The results revealed a sensitivity of 0.76, a specificity of 0.81, and an AUC of 0.86 for gastric cancer diagnosis with circulating miRNAs. In addition, subgroup analyses indicated that multiple miRNAs assays, non‑microarray screening approaches, and serum‑based miRNA assays exhibited good diagnostic performance in contrast to a single miRNA assay, microarray expression profiling screening, and plasma‑based miRNA group analysis. The diagnostic ability of miRNAs in early stage I‑II groups and the high expression group were approximately similar to that in the stage I‑IV groups and the low expression group. For the circulating miRNAs, our meta‑analysis identified a combination of multiple miRNAs, non‑microarray chip screening, and serum‑based miRNA assays were associated with the most effective GC diagnostic performance. However, many unclear molecular mechanisms limited the accuracy of the diagnostic results, and should be interpreted with caution. Further large‑scale prospective studies are required for validating the diagnostic applicability of circulating miRNAs in gastric cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.