Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30320305›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine

STI Risk Perception in the British Population and How It Relates to Sexual Behaviour and STI Healthcare Use: Findings From a Cross-sectional Survey (Natsal-3).

Soazig Clifton, Catherine H Mercer, Pam Sonnenberg, Clare Tanton, Nigel Field, Kirsten Gravningen, Gwenda Hughes, Fiona Mapp, Anne M Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Undisclosed Sexual Risk Exposures: Results of a Nationwide Compliance Study among Whole Blood Donors in Germany.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Significant Associations betweenInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Soazig CliftonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Catherine H MercerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Pam SonnenbergInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Clare TantonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Nigel FieldInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Kirsten GravningenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Sykehusvegen 38, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.
Gwenda HughesHIV and STI Department, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Fiona MappInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Anne M JohnsonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Mortimer Market Centre · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701757Wellcome Trust 084840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated how STI risk perception relates to behavioural STI risk and STI healthcare (sexual health clinic attendance/chlamydia testing) in the British population.

methodsNatsal-3, a national probability-sample survey undertaken 2010-12, included 8397 sexually-active 16-44 year-olds. Participants rated their risk of STIs (excluding HIV) given their current sexual lifestyle. Urine from a randomly-selected sub-sample of participants (n = 4550) was tested for prevalent STIs (

findingsMost men (64% (95% CI: 62-66)) and women (73% (72-74)) rated themselves as not at all at risk of STIs, 30% (29-32) men and 23% (22-25) women self-rated as not very much, and 5% (5-6) men and 3% (3-4) women as greatly/quite a lot at risk. Although those reporting STI risk behaviours were more likely to perceive themselves as at risk, > 70% men and > 85% women classified as having had unsafe sex in the past year, and similar proportions of those with a prevalent STI, perceived themselves as not at all or not very much at risk. Increased risk perception was associated with greater STI healthcare-use (past year), although not after adjusting for sexual behaviour, indicating in a mediation analysis that risk perception was neither necessary or sufficient for seeking care Furthermore, 58% (48-67) men and 31% (22-41) women who had unsafe sex (past year) and rated themselves as greatly/quite a lot at risk had neither attended nor tested.

interpretationMany people at risk of STIs in Britain underestimated their risk, and many who correctly perceived themselves to be at risk had not recently accessed STI healthcare. Health promotion needs to address this mismatch and ensure that people access healthcare appropriate to their needs.

Identifiers

PMID30320305
PMCPMC6180228
OpenAlexW2887043130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.