ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2018
Dynamic large-scale network synchronization from perception to action.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- New functional insights from the monkey claustrum.National science review · 2026Review
- Monitoring and modulating interconnected physiological systems in space using portable closed-loop technologies.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Linking the microarchitecture of neurotransmitter systems to large-scale MEG resting state networks.iScience · 2024Article
- Article
- Multiplex dynamic networks in the newborn brain disclose latent links with neurobehavioral phenotypes.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Brain criticality predicts individual levels of inter-areal synchronization in human electrophysiological data.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Early brain activity: Translations between bedside and laboratory.Progress in neurobiology · 2022Review
- Connectomics of human electrophysiology.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Pre-stimulus alpha oscillation and post-stimulus cortical activity differ in localization between consciously perceived and missed near-threshold somatosensory stimuli.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
- Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Neural Dynamics in Theta Oscillations Related to the Inhibition of Habitual Behavior.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Spatiotemporal Integrity and Spontaneous Nonlinear Dynamic Properties of the Salience Network Revealed by Human Intracranial Electrophysiology: A Multicohort Replication.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020Article
- Genuine cross-frequency coupling networks in human resting-state electrophysiological recordings.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- The Common Rhythm of Action and Perception.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2020Review
- Intrinsic connectome organization across temporal scales: New insights from cross-modal approaches.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Review
- Electrophysiological Brain Connectivity: Theory and Implementation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2019Article
- Dynamic large-scale network synchronization from perception to action.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory-guided actions entail the processing of sensory information, generation of perceptual decisions, and the generation of appropriate actions. Neuronal activity underlying these processes is distributed into sensory, fronto-parietal, and motor brain areas, respectively. How the neuronal processing is coordinated across these brain areas to support functions from perception to action remains unknown. We investigated whether phase synchronization in large-scale networks coordinate these processes. We recorded human cortical activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) during a task in which weak somatosensory stimuli remained unperceived or were perceived. We then assessed dynamic evolution of phase synchronization in large-scale networks from source-reconstructed MEG data by using advanced analysis approaches combined with graph theory. Here we show that perceiving and reporting of weak somatosensory stimuli is correlated with sustained strengthening of large-scale synchrony concurrently in delta/theta (3-7 Hz) and gamma (40-60 Hz) frequency bands. In a data-driven network localization, we found this synchronization to dynamically connect the task-relevant, that is, the fronto-parietal, sensory, and motor systems. The strength and temporal pattern of interareal synchronization were also correlated with the response times. These data thus show that key brain areas underlying perception, decision-making, and actions are transiently connected by large-scale dynamic phase synchronization in the delta/theta and gamma bands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.