Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30320241›Full record

ArticleKidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)2018

Systematic Review: ClearCode 34 - A Validated Prognostic Signature in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC).

Pooja Ghatalia, W Kimryn Rathmell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Promising Biomarkers and the Challenges to Reach the Clinic.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Role of Long Noncoding RNA (lncRNAs) Biomarkers in Renal Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pooja GhataliaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
W Kimryn RathmellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.

Funding

Enhancing Translational Science via Prospective InvestigationK24CA172355 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RATHMELL, WENDY KIMRYN · 2013 to 2017
$870k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA172355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard of care of patients with localized clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is observation after nephrectomy. However, a third of these patients have local or distant recurrence. Along with basic clinical and pathologic variables like stage, necrosis and grade, robust molecular based prognostic markers are needed that could help better predict groups of patients who will most benefit from such adjuvant treatment approaches. ccA/ccB classification was developed to classify ccRCC patients into high and low risk based on gene expression patterns. ClearCode 34 is a genetic signature that was developed from the ccA/ccB classification to predict recurrence in localized ccRCC patients. This signature has been validated in several patient cohorts and is ready for future testing in a variety of clinical scenarios. This review will evaluate the molecular signature ClearCode34, discuss its role in predicting recurrence and consider the rational application of this example of a molecular biomarker in the management of ccRCC.

Indexed as

biomarkerccAccBclearcode34prognosticRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30320241
PMCPMC6176730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.