Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30320178›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2018

How Much Bone Cement Is Utilized for Component Fixation in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Bhava R J Satish, Mohan Thadi, Subbiahgounder Thirumalaisamy, Apsingi Sunil, Praveen L Basanagoudar, Bernard Leo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bhava R J SatishResearch performed at BRJ Orthocentre and MAK Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Mohan ThadiResearch performed at BRJ Orthocentre and MAK Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Subbiahgounder ThirumalaisamyResearch performed at BRJ Orthocentre and MAK Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Apsingi SunilResearch performed at BRJ Orthocentre and MAK Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Praveen L BasanagoudarResearch performed at BRJ Orthocentre and MAK Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Bernard LeoResearch performed at BRJ Orthocentre and MAK Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Manipal Hospital · INAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · INKovai Medical Center and Hospital · INMaxCure Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo scientific evidence exists regarding the amount of bone cement used and discarded in primary cemented Total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the exact amount of bone cement utilized for component fixation in primary TKA.

methodsIn a prospective study carried out at five centers, 133 primary cemented TKAs were performed. One pack of 40g Palacos bone cement (PBC 40) was hand mixed and digitally applied during the surgery. After fixation of the TKA components, the remaining bone cement was methodically collected and weighed on a digital weighing scale. The actual quantity of cement utilized for component fixation was calculated.

resultsOn an average, 22.1 g of bone cement was utilized per joint, which accounted to 39 % of 57 g, the solidified dry weight of PBC 40. Among 133 knees, the cement usage was 20 % to 50% in 109 knees, more than 50% in 20 knees and less than 20% in 4 knees. Knees which received larger sized femoral implant required more cement compared to medium and small sizes. Knees which had pulse lavage had more cement utilization compared to knees which had simple syringe lavage before implantation.

conclusionLarge quantity of bone cement was handled than actual requirements in primary TKA when a standard 40g pack was used with the digital application technique, resulting in sizeable discard of bone cement. Customizing cement pack according to the implant size can potentially avoid this cement wastage. Future research is required to study the utility and economic impact of smaller packs (20 g or 30 g) of bone cement in primary TKA.

Indexed as

Bone cement quantityCement utilityPrimary knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30320178
PMCPMC6168233
OpenAlexW2894698531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.